Badilla, et al v. National Air Cargo Inc., et al

Filing 51

ORDER denying 18 Motion to Remand to State Court; denying 24 Motion to Amend or Correct; denying 37 Motion to Dismiss; adopting Report and Recommendation re 50 . Case is referred back to Magistrate Judge McCarthy for further proceedings. Signed by Hon. Richard J. Arcara on 10/21/2013. (JMB)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JESSICA T. BADILLA, et al., Plaintiffs, ORDER 12-CV-1066A v. NATIONAL AIR CARGO, INC., et al., Defendants. The above-referenced case was referred to Magistrate Judge Jeremiah J. McCarthy pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). On September 30, 2013, Magistrate Judge McCarthy filed a Report and Recommendation [50], recommending that plaintiffs’ motion to remand [18, 24] be denied, without prejudice to renewal following completion of limited discovery as specified in the Report and Recommendation, and that defendant Transafrik International Ltd.’s motion to dismiss [37] be denied, without prejudice to renewal, if it is determined that subject matter jurisdiction over the action exists. The Court has carefully reviewed the Report and Recommendation, the record in this case, and the pleadings and materials submitted by the parties, and no objections having been timely filed, it is hereby ORDERED, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), for the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation [50], plaintiffs’ motion to remand [18, 24] is denied, without prejudice to renewal following completion of limited discovery as specified in the Report and Recommendation, and defendant Transafrik International Ltd.’s motion to dismiss [37] is denied, without prejudice to renewal, if is determined that subject matter jurisdiction exists. The case is referred back to Magistrate Judge McCarthy for further proceedings. SO ORDERED. s/ Richard J. Arcara HONORABLE RICHARD J. ARCARA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DATED: October 21, 2013

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?