Castro v. Sobkowiak et al
Filing
50
-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP-ORDER adopting Magistrate Judge H. Kenneth Schroeder, Jr.'s Report and Recommendation 49 . Defendants' 37 40 43 Motions for Summary Judgment are granted, and the plaintiff's Complaint is dismissed. The Clerk of the Court shall take all steps necessary to close the case. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Richard J. Arcara on 9/11/15. (LAS)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
JUAN CASTRO, 11-B-2930,
Plaintiff,
DECISION AND ORDER
12-CV-1242A(Sr)
v.
PAUL SOBKOWIAK, et al.,
Defendants.
The above-referenced case was referred to Magistrate Judge H. Kenneth
Schroeder, Jr., pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). On August 10, 2015, Magistrate
Judge Schroeder filed a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 49), recommending
that defendants’ motions for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 37, 40 and 43) should be
granted.
The Court has carefully reviewed the Report and Recommendation, the
record in this case, and the pleadings and materials submitted by the parties, and no
objections having been timely filed, it is hereby
ORDERED, that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and for the reasons
set forth in Magistrate Judge Schroeder’s Report and Recommendation, defendants’
motions for summary judgment are granted, and the plaintiff’s Complaint is dismissed.
The Clerk of Court shall take all steps necessary to close the case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
____Richard J. Arcara____________
HONORABLE RICHARD J. ARCARA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Dated: September 11, 2015
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?