Bell v. Erie County Detention Facility
Filing
12
DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING Defendant's 8 Motion to Dismiss; DISMISSING Plaintiff's claims without prejudice; DIRECTING the Clerk of the Court to close this case. Signed by William M. Skretny, Chief Judge on 5/7/2014. (MEAL) - CLERK TO FOLLOW UP -
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
DONYALE K. BELL,
Plaintiff,
v.
DECISION AND ORDER
ERIE COUNTY DETENTION FACILITY,
13-CV-489S
Defendant.
1. Plaintiff Bell commenced this action on May 9, 2013, alleging violations of Title VII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, §§ 2000e et seq., and the New York State
Human Rights Law, N.Y. Exec. Law §§ 290 et seq. Bell alleges she was discriminated
and retaliated against because of her race and gender while working as a Youth
Detention Worker at the Erie County Detention Facility.
2. Defendant has moved to dismiss the Complaint on the ground that the detention
facility 1 is a department of a municipal entity and not subject to suit. Plaintiff responded to
the motion with an affidavit, styled as an amendment to her Complaint. Therein, she
disputes Defendant’s contention that she did not correctly name the department in which
she works, but does not address any other matter. As explained below, Defendant’s
motion to dismiss the claims against it, under both Federal and State law, must therefore
be granted.
3. In enacting the 1972 Amendments to Title VII, Congress extended the Act’s
1 According to Defendant, the correct name of the facility is Erie County Youth Services Center—Secure
Division.
1
coverage to include states and local governments as employers. Fitzpatrick v. Bitzer, 427
U.S. 445, 452-53 n.9 (1976); Ricci v. DeStefano, 557 U.S. 557, 609 (2009). Nonetheless,
federal courts must look to state law to determine whether a governmental entity may be
sued. Fed. R. Civ. P. 17(b)(3). Defendant argues correctly that the Erie County Detention
Facility is an improper party here.
4. Under New York Law, a county—such as the County of Erie—is a municipal
corporation capable of bringing suit and being sued. N.Y. Gen. Municipal Law §2. A
detention facility, however, is merely a subdivision of the municipal corporation. Brown v.
County of Erie, No. 12-CV-251A, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32507, at *6 (Mar. 8, 2013).
Because a municipal department does not exist separate and apart from the municipality,
nor is it considered its own legal entity, it cannot sue or be sued. Id. (finding Erie County
Sheriff’s Office (Holding Center) was improper party, but case could proceed against
named party County of Erie); see also, Loria v. The Town of Irondequoit, 775 F. Supp.
599 (WDNY 1990).
5. Plaintiff’s proposed amendment to the Complaint does not correct this deficiency
by, for example, seeking to add the County of Erie as a defendant. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s
proposed amendment is denied as futile, Defendant’s motion to dismiss on the ground it
is not a party subject to suit is granted, and Plaintiff’s claims are dismissed without
prejudice.
******
IT HEREBY IS ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 8) is
GRANTED;
2
FURTHER that Plaintiff’s claims are dismissed WITHOUT PREJUDICE;
FURTHER that the Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 7, 2014
Buffalo, New York
/s/William M. Skretny
WILLIAM M. SKRETNY
Chief Judge
United States District Court
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?