Curran v. Colvin
Filing
16
-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP- ORDER adopting Magistrate Judge Hugh B. Scott's Report and Recommendation 15 as filed on April 18, 2014. The Plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings in his favor 12 is granted. The decision of the Commissioner is reversed, and the matter is remanded for further administrative proceedings. The Clerk of Court shall close the case. Signed by Hon. Richard J. Arcara on 5/19/14. (LAS)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
ROBERT L. CURRAN,
Plaintiff,
ORDER
13-CV-721-A
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting
Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
The above-referenced case was referred to Magistrate Judge Hugh B. Scott,
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) for pretrial proceedings. On April 18, 2014,
Magistrate Judge Scott filed a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 15)
recommending that the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security be reversed
and the action be remanded for further administrative proceedings. Plaintiff’s motion
for judgment on the pleadings in his favor (Dkt. No. 12) should be granted.
The Court has carefully reviewed the Report and Recommendation, the record in
this case, and the materials submitted by the parties, and no objections having been
timely filed, it is hereby
ORDERED, that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and for the reasons set forth
in Magistrate Judge Scott’s Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 15), the decision of
the Commissioner is reversed and the matter is remanded for further administrative
proceedings. Plaintiff Curran’s motion for judgment on the pleadings in his favor (Dkt.
No. 12) is granted.
The Clerk of Court shall take all steps necessary to close the case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
____Richard J. Arcara____________
HONORABLE RICHARD J. ARCARA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Dated: May 19, 2014
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?