Ahmed v. Colvin
Filing
21
DECISION AND ORDER adopting Magistrate Judge Michael J. Roemer's Report and Recommendation 20 . Plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings 11 is granted and the Commissioner's motion for similar relief 17 is denied. The ma tter is remanded to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation. The Clerk of the Court shall take all steps necessary to close the case. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Richard J. Arcara on 4/27/17. (LAS)-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP-
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
JAMAL ABDO AHMED,
Plaintiff,
DECISION AND ORDER
14-CV-155A
v.
NANCY A. BERRYHILL,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
The above-referenced case was referred to Magistrate Judge Michael J.
Roemer, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). On March 28, 2017, Magistrate Judge
Roemer filed a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 20), recommending that
Plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the pleadings (Dkt. No. 11) be granted, that the
Commissioner’s motion for similar relief (Dkt. No. 17) be denied, and this matter be
remanded to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings.
The Court has carefully reviewed the Report and Recommendation, the
record in this case, and the pleadings and materials submitted by the parties, and no
objections having been timely filed, it is hereby
ORDERED, that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and for the reasons
set forth in Magistrate Judge Roemer’s Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff’s motion
for judgment on the pleadings is granted, the Commissioner’s motion for similar relief is
denied, and this matter is remanded to the Commissioner for further administrative
proceedings consistent with Magistrate Judge Roemer’s Report and Recommendation.
The Clerk of Court shall take all steps necessary to close the case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
____Richard J. Arcara____________
HONORABLE RICHARD J. ARCARA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Dated: April 27, 2017
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?