Salim v. County of Erie et al

Filing 73

DECISION AND ORDER adopting Magistrate Judge H. Kenneth Schroeder, Jr.'s Report and Recommendation 69 . The defendants' motions for dismissal 39 41 43 46 55 and 60 are all granted as specified in the Report and Recommendation. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment dismissing the action in its entirety as against each defendant. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Richard J. Arcara on 1/25/2019. (LAS)-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

RAFIQ J. SALIM,
Plaintiff,
DECISION AND ORDER
15-CV-418-A

v.
COUNTY OF ERIE, et al.,
Defendants.

This case was referred to Magistrate Judge H. Kenneth Schroeder, Jr.,
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) for the conduct of pretrial proceedings. On
December 19, 2018, Magistrate Judge Schroeder filed a Report and
Recommendation (Dkt. No. 69) recommending that defendants’ multiple motions to
dismiss (Dkt. Nos. 39, 41, 43, 46, 55 & 60) be granted.
The Court has carefully reviewed the Report and Recommendation, pro se
plaintiff Salim’s objections, defendants’ responses, and it is hereby
ORDERED, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and for the reasons set forth in
the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and giving due consideration
to plaintiff’s status as a pro se litigant by affording his contentions the most favorable
reading possible in the circumstances, the defendants’ motions for dismissal (Dkt.
Nos. 39, 41, 43, 46, 55 & 60) are all granted as specified in the Report and
Recommendation (Dkt. No. 69), and it is further
ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall enter Judgment dismissing the

action in its entirety as against each defendant.
SO ORDERED.
____s/Richard J. Arcara__________
HONORABLE RICHARD J. ARCARA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Dated: January 25, 2019

2