Romano v. Levitt et al

Filing 60

DECISION AND ORDER adopting Magistrate Judge Hugh B. Scott's Report and Recommendation 54 . To the extent that plaintiff's motion 44 is construed as seeking injunctive relief, the motion is denied. The case is recommitted to Magistrate Judge Scott consistent with the original referral order. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Richard J. Arcara on 6/9/17. (LAS)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

ANTHONY ROMANO,
Plaintiff,
DECISION AND ORDER
15-CV-518A

v.
DOCTOR LEVITT,
DOCTOR S. LEUTHE,
Defendants.

This case was referred to Magistrate Judge Hugh B. Scott, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 636(b)(1)(B). On May 5, 2017, Magistrate Judge Scott filed a Report and
Recommendation (Dkt. No. 54), recommending that, to the extent plaintiff’s motion
should be construed as one seeking injunctive relief, the motion (Dkt. No. 44) should be
denied.
The Court has carefully reviewed the Report and Recommendation, the record in
this case, and the pleadings and materials submitted by the parties, and no objections
having been timely filed, it is hereby
ORDERED, that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and for the reasons set forth
in Magistrate Judge Scott’s Report and Recommendation, that to the extent plaintiff’s
motion seeks an injunction, that motion is denied.
This case is recommitted to Magistrate Judge Scott consistent with the original
referral order (Dkt. No. 30).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

____Richard J. Arcara____________
HONORABLE RICHARD J. ARCARA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Dated: June 9, 2017