Jones, et al v. Crisis Services of Erie County, et al

Filing 108

DECISION AND ORDER adopting 107 Report & Recommendation and denying 103 Plaintiffs' Motion to Amend. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Frank P. Geraci, Jr. on 1/24/2020. (MFM)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ROCHELLE M. JONES, et al., Plaintiffs, Case # 16-CV-234-FPG v. DECISION AND ORDER CRISIS SERVICES OF ERIE COUNTY, et al., Defendants. On September 27, 2019, Plaintiffs filed a motion to amend the complaint. ECF No. 103. On December 12, 2019, United States Magistrate Judge Hugh B. Scott issued a Report & Recommendation (“R&R”) recommending that the motion be denied. Plaintiffs did not file any objection to the R&R. In reviewing a Report and Recommendation, this Court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). Since no objections were filed, this Court is not required to conduct a de novo review of the R&R. See Huang v. J & A Ent. Inc., No. 09-CV-5587, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. Jan. 16, 2013) (collecting cases). Furthermore, having reviewed the record and the R&R, the Court has not identified any plain error requiring correction. See id. Accordingly, the R&R (ECF No. 107) is ADOPTED in full and Plaintiffs’ motion to amend (ECF No. 103) is DENIED for the reasons stated therein. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 24, 2020 Rochester, New York ______________________________________ HON. FRANK P. GERACI, JR. Chief Judge United States District Court 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?