Williams v. Perry et al

Filing 25

DECISION AND ORDER adopting Magistrate Judge H. Kenneth Schroeder, Jr.'s Report and Recommendation 23 . Plaintiff's claim that Defendants falsified a misbehavior report is dismissed, Plaintiff's claims against the Defendants in their official capacities are dismissed, and Plaintiff's excessive force claims against the Defendants in their individual capacities may proceed. The case is referred back to Magistrate Judge Schroeder for further proceedings. A copy of the Decision and Order, along with this entry, has been mailed to Michael Jamal Williams, 10-B-1768, AUBURN CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, Box 618, Auburn, NY 13021. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Richard J. Arcara on 5/3/2018. (LAS)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK MICHAEL JAMAL WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, DECISION AND ORDER 16-CV-1042A v. SCOTT PERRY, et al., Defendants. The above-referenced case was referred to Magistrate Judge H. Kenneth Schroeder, Jr., pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). On April 5, 2018, Magistrate Judge Schroeder filed a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 23), recommending that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 19) be granted in part and denied in part, as follows: 1) Pro se Plaintiff’s claim that Defendants falsified a misbehavior report be dismissed, 2) Plaintiff’s claims against the Defendants in their official capacities be dismissed, and 3) Plaintiff’s excessive force claims against the Defendants in their individual capacities should proceed. The Court has carefully reviewed the Report and Recommendation, the record in this case, and the pleadings and materials submitted by the parties, and no objections having been timely filed, it is hereby ORDERED, that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and for the reasons set forth in Magistrate Judge Schroeder’s Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff’s claim that Defendants falsified a misbehavior report is dismissed, Plaintiff’s claims against the Defendants in their official capacities are dismissed, and Plaintiff’s excessive force claims against the Defendants in their individual capacities may proceed. The case is referred back to Magistrate Judge Schroeder for further proceedings. IT IS SO ORDERED. ____Richard J. Arcara____________ HONORABLE RICHARD J. ARCARA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Dated: May 3, 2018

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?