Palmer v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
29
DECISION AND ORDER granting 24 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Hon. Hugh B. Scott on 7/16/2020. (GAI)
Case 1:17-cv-01154-HBS Document 29 Filed 07/16/20 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Anthony W. Palmer,
Plaintiff,
Decision and Order
17-CV-1154 (HBS)
Consent
v.
Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
On November 28, 2018, the Court heard from the parties and issued a Decision and Order
from the bench that vacated the Commissioner’s final determination and that remanded the case for
further administrative proceedings. (Dkt. No. 17.) On March 29, 2019, in accordance with a
stipulation between the parties (Dkt. No. 21), the Court awarded plaintiff attorney fees in the
amount of $6,794.05 under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412. (Dkt. No.
22.) One of the conditions attached to the award was that plaintiff potentially would not receive the
award, depending on whether he owed any debts to the federal government that were subject to
offset under the U.S. Treasury Offset Program.
On June 8, 2020, plaintiff’s counsel filed a motion for an award of attorney fees in the
amount of $14,639.57, under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). (Dkt. No. 24.) Plaintiff’s counsel informs the
Court, and the Commissioner does not contest, that the EAJA award likely was offset in its entirety
to help satisfy an unspecified debt. (Dkt. No. 24-1 at 2.) Plaintiff’s counsel advises further that on
April 19 and May 22, 2020, the Commissioner issued two Notices of Award, based on a favorable
decision, totaling $58,558.28 in past-due benefits. Of that amount, the Commissioner withheld just
under 25 percent, or $14,150.90, to pay any duly approved attorney fee. Plaintiff’s counsel has set
forth details in the motion explaining the time spent on the case and how the amount sought is
Case 1:17-cv-01154-HBS Document 29 Filed 07/16/20 Page 2 of 2
consistent with the attorney-client contract, the amount of time spent on the case, prevailing rates
for the type of work performed, and the statutory cap for fees.
The Commissioner takes no position on the motion, since Section 406(b) are paid from the
claimant’s benefits rather than from agency funds. (Dkt. No. 27.)
After reviewing the motion papers, the Court finds that the request is in fact consistent with
statutory authority and with cases that have addressed similar requests. See generally, e.g., Gisbrecht v.
Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789 (2002); Wurzer v. Comm’r, No. 15-CV-6528 CJS, 2019 WL 3821897 (W.D.N.Y.
Aug. 14, 2019); Barone v. Saul, No. 13-CV-896, 2019 WL 3296616, at *2 (W.D.N.Y. July 23, 2019).
Unlike Wurzer and Barone, no refund of the EAJA award will be necessary since the award was offset.
Accordingly, the motion is granted. Plaintiff’s counsel is hereby awarded $14,639.57 in attorney fees
under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b).
SO ORDERED.
__/s Hugh B. Scott________
DATED: July 16, 2020
Hon. Hugh B. Scott
United States Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?