Midalgo v. Keough et al
Filing
97
ORDER dismissing the action for failure to prosecute pursuant to Local Rule 41.2. ***CLERK TO FOLLOW UP. Signed by Hon. David G. Larimer on 3/10/09. (EMA)
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK _______________________________________________ GABRIEL G. H. MIDALGO, Plaintiff, DECISION AND ORDER 05-CV-6004L v. SGT. KEOUGH, et al., Defendants. ________________________________________________ GABRIEL G. H. MIDALGO, Plaintiff,
v. SGT. BARBERRY, et al., Defendants. __________________________________________________ GABRIEL G. H. MIDALGO, Plaintiff,
06-CV-6223L
v. SGT. MORSE, et al., Defendants. _____________________________________________________
06-CV-6572L
On February 5, 2009, the Court issued an order directing the parties to show cause in writing, no later than March 2, 2009, why these three cases should not be dismissed pursuant to Local Rule 41.2, based on plaintiff's failure to prosecute any of these cases. Plaintiff has not responded to the order to show cause. Accordingly, these actions are dismissed for failure to prosecute.
CONCLUSION
Each of these actions is dismissed for failure to prosecute, pursuant to Rule 41.2 of the Local Rules for the Western District of New York. IT IS SO ORDERED.
_______________________________________ DAVID G. LARIMER United States District Judge
Dated: Rochester, New York March 10, 2009.
-2-
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
