Brickey et al v. Dolgencorp, Inc. et al

Filing 137

ORDER re plaintiffs' 104 128 MOTION to Certify Class. By letter dated 8/13/09, defendants seek leave to file one Memorandum of Law in response to both motions with a 60 page limitation. By letter dated 8/13/09 plaintiffs do not oppose defend ants' request but seek leave to file a single 30 page Memorandum of Law in reply to defendants' Memorandum in opposition.The page extensions requested seem excessive but, in the interest of completeness, I will GRANT BOTH REQUESTS. Signed by Hon. David G. Larimer on 8/17/09. (EMA)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK _______________________________________________ TAMMY BRICKEY, et al.,

Plaintiffs, ORDER 06-CV-6084L v. DOLGENCORP., INC., et al.,

Defendants. ________________________________________________

Plaintiffs have filed two motions. By letter dated August 13, 2009, defendants seek leave to file one Memorandum of Law in response to both motions with a 60 page limitation. By letter dated August 13, 2009, plaintiffs do not oppose defendants' request but seek leave to file a single 30 page Memorandum of Law in reply to defendants' Memorandum in opposition. Frankly, the page extensions requested seem excessive but, in the interest of completeness, I will GRANT BOTH REQUESTS. Counsel are reminded, though, that lengthy memoranda do not necessarily equate to good ones. IT IS SO ORDERED.

_______________________________________ DAVID G. LARIMER United States District Judge

Dated: Rochester, New York August 17, 2009.