Brickey et al v. Dolgencorp, Inc. et al
ORDER that plaintiffs' response 170 , which I treat as a motion for reconsideration, is denied. Signed by Hon. David G. Larimer on 10/30/09. (EMA)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK _______________________________________________ TAMMY BRICKEY, et al.,
Plaintiffs, DECISION AND ORDER 06-CV-6084L v. DOLGENCORP, INC., et al.,
Defendants moved for leave to file a surreply concerning a pending motion (Dkt. #168). After due consideration, the Court granted the motion (Dkt. #169). By letter dated October 28, 2009, filed that same day (Dkt. #170), plaintiffs seek an opportunity to oppose the motion to file a surreply or, in the alternative, to file a response to that surreply. I consider plaintiffs' motion in the nature of a motion for reconsideration and deny it. The Court has ample information before it on the pending motion. If it believes further briefing is necessary, the parties will be so advised. If argument is scheduled, either side can request leave to file post-argument briefs.
CONCLUSION Plaintiffs' response (Dkt. #170), which I treat as a motion for reconsideration, is denied. IT IS SO ORDERED.
_______________________________________ DAVID G. LARIMER United States District Judge
Dated: Rochester, New York October 30, 2009.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?