Barnes v. Fedele et al

Filing 133

ORDER denying 131 Motion for Reconsideration re 89 Order on Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Hon. David G. Larimer on 3/23/12. (EMA)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
_______________________________________________
ARRELLO BARNES,
Plaintiff,
DECISION AND ORDER
07-CV-6197L
v.
FEDELE, et al.,
Defendants.
________________________________________________
In a decision and order filed January 13, 2011 (Dkt. #89), this Court granted defendants’
motions to dismiss in part and denied the motions in part. Some claims and some defendants were
dismissed from the lawsuit. Now, by pro se motion filed March 5, 2012 (Dkt. #131), styled as a
“Request to Add Defendants,” plaintiff, in essence, asked this Court to reconsider its prior decision.
After reviewing the motion, which was filed over a year after this Court’s decision, I find no basis
to alter, modify, or change the Court’s prior decision filed January 13, 2011.

CONCLUSION
Plaintiff’s motion styled as a Request to Add Defendants, is in all respects denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

_______________________________________
DAVID G. LARIMER
United States District Judge
Dated: Rochester, New York
March 23, 2012.