Crenshaw v. Kirkpatrick et al

Filing 116

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 115 of United States Magistrate Judge Jonathan W. Feldman and denying in all respects plaintiff's motion to amend the complaint 93 . Signed by Hon. David G. Larimer on 4/30/12. (EMA)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
_______________________________________________
WILLIAM CRENSHAW,

Plaintiff,
DECISION AND ORDER
08-CV-6186L
v.
CORRECTION OFFICER HAMILTON,
et al.,
Defendants.
________________________________________________
This Court referred all pretrial matters in this case to United States Magistrate Judge Jonathan
W. Feldman pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Plaintiff moved to amend his complaint and in a
thorough Report and Recommendation (Dkt. #115), Magistrate Judge Feldman discussed the facts
of the case, the history of prior proceedings and the legal standards concerning such a request.
Magistrate Judge Feldman recommended that the Court deny plaintiff’s motion to amend or
supplement his complaint.
The time within which to file objections has lapsed and no objections have been filed. In
spite of the lack of objections, this Court carefully reviewed the pending motion (Dkt. #93) and the
above-referenced Report and Recommendation. I see no reason to modify or reject the
recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. He carefully considered all the factors, and I agree with
his assessment and, therefore, plaintiff’s motion to amend the complaint (Dkt. #93) is in all respects
denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

_______________________________________
DAVID G. LARIMER
United States District Judge
Dated: Rochester, New York
April 30, 2012.