Crenshaw v. Kirkpatrick et al

Filing 35

ORDER that defendants must advise the Court within 20 days of this order whether they intend to move to dismiss relative to the 8 new defendants that were added by plaintiff in his motion to amend and if such a motion is contemplated, how much time will be necessary to file it. Signed by Hon. David G. Larimer on 11/5/09. (EMA)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK _______________________________________________ WILLIAM CRENSHAW, Plaintiff, DECISION AND ORDER 08-CV-6186L v. JAMES HARTMAN, et al., Defendants. ________________________________________________

By order entered April 6, 2009 (Dkt. #28), the Court granted plaintiff's motion (Dkt. #21) to amend his complaint. There is now pending a motion to dismiss by the original eight (8) defendants in the case, and the Court is reviewing that motion which was opposed by plaintiff (Dkt. #27). Defendants have not filed any motion to dismiss relative to the eight (8) new defendants that were added by plaintiff in his motion to amend. Within twenty (20) days of this order, defendants must advise the Court whether they intend to move to dismiss or not and if such a motion is contemplated, how much time will be necessary to file it. IT IS SO ORDERED.

_______________________________________ DAVID G. LARIMER United States District Judge Dated: Rochester, New York November 5, 2009.