Ward v. Empire Vision Centers, Inc.

Filing 97

ORDER that because there was no trial in this matter, the Court is treating plaintiff's 94 Motion for New Trial as a Motion for Reconsideration. The motion is in all respects denied. Signed by Hon. David G. Larimer on 3/25/10. (EMA)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK _______________________________________________ ERNESTINE WARD, Plaintiff, DECISION AND ORDER 08-CV-6193L v. EMPIRE VISION CENTERS, INC., Defendant. ________________________________________________ Plaintiff, Ernestine Ward, has filed a document entitled "Notice of Motion for a New Trial" (Dkt. #94). There was no trial in this case and, therefore, I treat the pleading as a Motion for Reconsideration. That motion is in all respects denied. IT IS SO ORDERED. _______________________________________ DAVID G. LARIMER United States District Judge Dated: Rochester, New York March 25, 2010.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?