Gomez-Ka'Dawid v. Eagen et al

Filing 11

ORDER, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m) notice is hereby given that unless the plaintiff shows good cause, in writing, not later than February 12, 2010 for the failure to effect service of process within the time limits specified by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, this action will be dismissed without prejudice, ( Response due by 2/12/2010.). Signed by Hon. Michael A. Telesca on 1/7/2010. (TO)

Download PDF
PS-O UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK YAHKIMA GOMEZ-KA'DAWID, 04A0515, Plaintiff, -vLESTER WRIGHT, Asst. Deputy Commissioner; DR. DEACEVEDO; DR. JANE DOE; DR. WHALEN; MR. B. LECUYER, Head Nurse Practitioner; MS. WREST, Nurse Practitioner; MS. OBERTEAN, Nurse Practitioner; R. WOODS, Superintendent; Lieutenant LAREAU; Sergeant R. LYNCH; Sergeant P. WEST; Sergeant MENARD; C.O. G. DELANEY; C.O. MARTIN; C.O. TYLER; and Rabbi FRIEDMAN, Defendants. 08-CV-6530Fe ORDER Plaintiff YAHKIMA GOMEZ-KA'DAWID, proceeding pro se, filed the complaint in this action on November 21, 2008. On March 27, 2009, the Court granted plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis and directed the Clerk of Court to cause the United States Marshal to serve the summons and complaint. The Clerk of Court mailed the plaintiff U.S. Marshal Process Receipt and Return forms and a notice of plaintiff's obligations under Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m) on April 1, 2009. Plaintiff has failed to return the U.S. Marshal Process Receipt and Return forms or otherwise effect service. Accordingly, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m) notice is hereby given that unless the plaintiff shows good cause, in writing, not later than February 12, 2010 for the failure to effect service of process within the time limits specified by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, this action will be dismissed without prejudice. SO ORDERED. S/ MICHAEL A. TELESCA MICHAEL A. TELESCA United States District Judge Dated: January 7, 2010 Rochester, New York 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?