Gonzalez v. Bradt

Filing 17

ORDER denying with prejudice 12 Motion for Default Judgment. Signed by Hon. Michael A. Telesca on 08/29/14. (AFB)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK HECTOR GONZALEZ, Petitioner, -vs- No. 6:13-CV-6574(MAT) DECISION AND ORDER MARK BRADT, Respondent, On April 7, 2014, this Court dismissed the pro se habeas corpus petition filed by petitioner Hector Gonzalez, denied his request for appointment of counsel, and denied a certificate of appealability. Judgment was entered on April 8, 2014. On April 4, 2014, pursuant to the prisoner mailbox rule, Petitioner filed a motion for default judgment (Dkt #12) against Respondent on the basis that Respondent failed to respond to Petitioner’s request for admissions pursuant to Rule 36 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. However, the motion for default judgment did not appear on the Court’s docket until April 23, 2014. This motion is now moot, in light of the Court’s dismissal of Petitioner’s habeas petition on the merits. In the alternative, the Court declines to enter a default judgment in favor of Petitioner. “Although, in civil cases, a party’s failure to respond justifies the entry of judgment against the defaulting party, default in responding to a habeas petition presents a different situation.” Jackson v. Kuhlman, 94–CV–5934, 1996 WL 1088202, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. -1- Oct. 8, 1996) (citation omitted). The Second Circuit made it clear in Bermudez v. Reid, 733 F.2d 18 (2d Cir. 1984), that default judgment should not be granted in favor of a habeas petitioner without a court first reaching the merits of the underlying petition. Id. at 21. As noted above, the Court has already found that Petitioner’s claims for habeas relief lack merit. Thus, the entry of a judgment of default against Respondent is unwarranted. See id. Petitioner’s motion for default judgment (Dkt #12) is denied with prejudice. SO ORDERED. S/Michael A. Telesca HONORABLE MICHAEL A. TELESCA United States District Judge DATED: August 29, 2014 Rochester, New York -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?