Brown v. Signorella et al

Filing 32

DECISION & ORDER granting 23 Motion to Compel. By no later than 8/8/2016, defendants are directed to produce a copy of the log books of both the facility infirmary and the field house for the night of October 17, 2013. Signed by Hon. Marian W. Payson on 7/19/2016. Copy of Decision & Order sent by First Class Mail to plaintiff Tyreen Brown on 7/19/2016. (KAH)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK _______________________________________ TYREEN BROWN, DECISION & ORDER Plaintiff, 14-CV-6139W v. SIGNORELLA, Sergeant, Elmira Correctional Facility, et al., Defendants. _______________________________________ Plaintiff Tyreen Brown (“Brown”), acting pro se, filed a complaint asserting claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, against defendant Signorella, a sergeant employed by the New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision (“DOCCS”), and an unnamed DOCCS correctional officer, both of whom were employed at Elmira Correctional Facility. (Docket # 15). Brown’s complaint alleges that on that October 17, 2003, a fight occurred between inmates in the prison field house, following which he was escorted by defendant Signorella and the unknown officer to the facility infirmary. (Id.). He claims that the two defendants beat him during the elevator ride to the infirmary, causing him serious injury. (Id.). Currently pending before this Court is Brown’s motion for an order compelling defendant to provide him information to enable him to identify the unnamed corrections officer. (Docket # 23). Although this Court’s scheduling order required defendants to provide plaintiff the names of “all persons who were present at, witnessed, or investigated the events from which plaintiff’s claim arose” (Docket # 19), counsel for defendants maintains that the records relating to the field house fight do not identify “a corrections officer who allegedly escorted [plaintiff] onto an elevator to the infirmary.” (Docket # 26 at ¶ 6). Counsel also represents that he has requested the Elmira Correctional Facility to provide any records that may assist with the identification. (Id. at ¶ 7). The docket does not reflect that any records identifying the alleged escorting officer have since been produced, and Brown’s subsequent filings suggest that he is still trying to identify the officer. (See Docket ## 27-29). In these submissions, Brown seeks the names of all corrections officers who worked in the field house of the Elmira Correctional Facility the night of October 17, 2013. (Docket # 27 at 2). Brown also seeks production of a copy of the facility infirmary log book, including information identifying which corrections officer signed the log book with defendant Signorella on the night of October 17, 2013, and a copy of the field house log book for that night. (Id.). Clearly, Brown is entitled to records to assist him in identifying the officer who allegedly assaulted him in the elevator on the way to the infirmary on October 17, 2013. Indeed, defendants’ counsel does not oppose the motion, but promises to try to obtain the information to identify the alleged officer. Because the record is unclear as to whether defendants have searched for the specific records requested by Brown, I order that defendants do so. Specifically, by no later than August 8, 2016, defendants are directed to produce a copy of the log books of both the facility infirmary and the field house for the night of October 17, 2 2013. Defendants are also directed to make available for Brown’s inspection photographs and names of the corrections officers whose signatures appear in the log books for that night. Accordingly, Brown’s motion to compel (Docket # 23) is GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Marian W. Payson MARIAN W. PAYSON United States Magistrate Judge Dated: Rochester, New York July 19, 2016 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?