Yao-Yi et al v. Wilmington Trust Company
Filing
240
ORDER Granting Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement, Approving Form and Manner of Notice, and Setting Date for Hearing on Final Approval of Settlement. Final Fairness Hearing set for January 11, 2023, at 2:00 p.m., in the United States Courthouse, 100 State Street, Rochester, New York 14614. Signed by Hon. Elizabeth A. Wolford on 10/11/2022. (CDH)
Case 6:14-cv-06631-EAW-MJP Document 240 Filed 10/11/22 Page 1 of 13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
YAO-YI LIU, TUNG-HUNG HSIEH, and
CHIU-PAO TSAI, Individually and on Behalf
of All Others Similarly Situated,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
6:14-cv-06631 EAW
WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY, and
WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION,
Defendants.
ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION
SETTLEMENT, APPROVING FORM AND MANNER OF NOTICE, AND
SETTING DATE FOR HEARING ON FINAL APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT
WHEREAS, as of August 12, 2022, Plaintiffs Yao-Yi Liu, Tung-Hung Hsieh, and
Chiu-Pao Tsai (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), on behalf of themselves and all other members
of the proposed Settlement Class (defined below), on the one hand, and Wilmington Trust
Company and Wilmington Trust, National Association (“Wilmington” or “Defendants”),
on the other, entered into a Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement (the “Stipulation”) in
the above-titled litigation (the “Action”), which is subject to review under Rule 23 of the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and which, together with the exhibits thereto, sets forth
the terms and conditions of the proposed settlement of the Action and the claims alleged in
the Amended Complaint filed on May 22, 2015 (Dkt. 16), on the merits and with prejudice
(the “Settlement”); and
Case 6:14-cv-06631-EAW-MJP Document 240 Filed 10/11/22 Page 2 of 13
WHEREAS, the Court has reviewed and considered the Stipulation and the
accompanying exhibits; and
WHEREAS, the Parties to the Stipulation have consented to the entry of this order;
and
WHEREAS, all capitalized terms used in this order that are not otherwise defined
herein have the meanings defined in the Stipulation;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, this 11th day of October, 2022,
that:
1.
The Court has reviewed the Stipulation and preliminarily finds, pursuant to
Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(e)(1), that the Court will likely be able to approve the proposed
Settlement as fair, reasonable, and adequate under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
23(e)(2), subject to further consideration at the Settlement Hearing described below.
(a)
Pursuant to Rules 23(a) and (b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure, the Court hereby preliminarily certifies, for the purposes of the Settlement only,
the Settlement Class of: all persons and entities who invested in the Bio Profit Scheme and
were damaged thereby. Excluded from the Settlement Class are (i) Defendants; (ii) any
person who was an officer or director of Defendants; (iii) any firm or entity in which any
Defendants have or had a controlling interest; (iv) the parents or subsidiaries of Defendants;
(v) the legal representatives, agents, heirs, beneficiaries, successors-in-interest, or assigns
of any excluded person or entity, in their respective capacity as such; and (vi) any persons
or entities who or which exclude themselves by submitting a valid request for exclusion in
accordance with the requirements set forth below and in the Notice.
-2-
Case 6:14-cv-06631-EAW-MJP Document 240 Filed 10/11/22 Page 3 of 13
2.
The Court finds and preliminarily concludes that the prerequisites of class
action certification under Rules 23(a) and 23(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedures
have been satisfied for the Settlement Class defined herein and for the purposes of the
Settlement only, in that:
(a)
the members of the Settlement Class are so numerous that joinder of
all Settlement Class Members is impracticable;
(b)
there are questions of law and fact common to the Settlement Class
(c)
the claims of Class Representatives are typical of the Settlement
Members;
Class’s claims;
(d)
Class Representatives and Class Counsel have fairly and adequately
represented and protected the interests of the Settlement Class;
(e)
the questions of law and fact common to Settlement Class Members
predominate over any individual questions; and
(f)
a class action is superior to other available methods for the fair and
efficient adjudication of the controversy, considering that the claims of Settlement Class
Members in the Action are substantially similar and would, if tried, involve substantially
identical proofs and may therefore be efficiently litigated and resolved on an aggregate
basis as a class action; the amounts of the claims of many of the Settlement Class Members
are too small to justify the expense of individual actions; and it does not appear that there
is significant interest among Settlement Class Members in individually controlling the
litigation of their claims.
-3-
Case 6:14-cv-06631-EAW-MJP Document 240 Filed 10/11/22 Page 4 of 13
3.
Pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and for the
purposes of the Settlement only, Yao-Yi Liu, Tung-Hung Hsieh, and Chiu-Pao Tsai are
preliminarily certified as Class Representatives for the Settlement Class. The law firm of
Rosca Scarlato, LLC is preliminarily appointed Class Counsel for the Settlement Class.
4.
A hearing (the “Settlement Hearing”), pursuant to Rule 23(e) of the Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure, is hereby scheduled to be held before the Court, at the Kenneth
B. Keating Federal Building, 100 State Street, Rochester, NY 14614, in Courtroom 3, on
January 11, 2023, at 2:00 p.m. for the following purposes:
(a)
to determine whether the proposed Settlement is fair, reasonable, and
adequate, and should be approved by the Court;
(b)
to determine whether the proposed Final Order and Judgment
(“Judgment”) as provided under the Stipulation should be entered, and to determine
whether the release by the Settlement Class of the Released Claims, as set forth in the
Stipulation, should be provided to the Released Defendant Parties;
(c)
to determine, for purposes of the Settlement only, whether the
Settlement Class should be finally certified; whether Plaintiffs should be finally certified
as Class Representatives for the Settlement Class; and whether the law firm of Rosca
Scarlato, LLC should be finally appointed as Class Counsel for the Settlement Class;
(d)
to determine whether the proposed Plan of Allocation for the
proceeds of the Settlement is fair and reasonable and should be approved by the Court;
(e)
to consider Class Counsel’s application for an award of attorneys’
fees and expenses (“Fee and Expense Application”) (which may include an application
-4-
Case 6:14-cv-06631-EAW-MJP Document 240 Filed 10/11/22 Page 5 of 13
for a Service Award to Class Representatives in connection with their efforts representing
the interests of the Class); and
(f)
5.
to rule upon such other matters as the Court may deem appropriate.
The Court reserves the right to approve the Settlement with or without
modification and with or without further notice to the Settlement Class of any kind. The
Court further reserves the right to enter the Judgment approving the Settlement regardless
of whether it will approve the proposed Plan of Allocation or award attorneys’ fees and/or
expenses, or a Service Award. The Court may also adjourn the Settlement Hearing or
modify any of the dates herein without further notice to members of the Settlement Class.
6.
The Court approves the form, substance and requirements of the Notice of
Pendency of Class Action, Proposed Settlement, and Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and
Expenses (the “Notice”) and the Proof of Claim and Release form (“Proof of Claim”),
substantially in the forms submitted to the Court at Dkt. 239-1.
7.
The Court approves the retention of Strategic Claims Services as the Claims
Administrator. The Claims Administrator shall cause the Notice and the Proof of Claim,
substantially in the forms annexed hereto, to be mailed, by first-class mail, postage prepaid,
on or before thirty (30) days after entry of this Preliminary Approval Order (“Notice
Date”), to all Settlement Class Members who can be identified with reasonable effort.
8.
The Claims Administrator shall use reasonable efforts to give notice to the
brokerage firm or firms through which the investments in the Bio Profit Funds were sold.
(a)
Such nominees SHALL EITHER: (i) WITHIN TEN (10)
CALENDAR DAYS of receipt of the Notice, request from the Claims Administrator
-5-
Case 6:14-cv-06631-EAW-MJP Document 240 Filed 10/11/22 Page 6 of 13
sufficient copies of the Notice to forward to all such beneficial owners and WITHIN TEN
(10) CALENDAR DAYS of receipt of those Notices from the Claims Administrator
forward them to all such beneficial owners; or (ii) WITHIN TEN (10) CALENDAR
DAYS of receipt of the Notice, provide a list of the names and addresses of all such
beneficial owners to the Claims Administrator and the Claims Administrator is ordered to
send the Notice promptly to such identified beneficial owners.
(b)
Nominees shall also provide email addresses for all such beneficial
owners to the Claims Administrator, to the extent they are available.
(c)
Nominees who elect to send the Notice to their beneficial owners
SHALL ALSO send a statement to the Claims Administrator confirming that the mailing
was made and shall retain their mailing records for use in connection with any further
notices that may be provided in the Action.
(d)
Upon full and timely compliance with these directions, such
nominees may seek reimbursement of their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses actually
incurred by providing the Claims Administrator with proper documentation supporting
the expenses for which reimbursement is sought. The Claims Administrator shall, if
requested, reimburse nominees out of the Settlement Fund solely for their reasonable outof-pocket expenses incurred in providing notice to beneficial owners in an amount not to
exceed $0.05 plus postage at the current pre-sort rate used by the Claims Administrator
per Notice Packet mailed; or $0.05 per name, mailing address, and email address (to the
extent available) provided to the Claims Administrator.
-6-
Any disputes as to the
Case 6:14-cv-06631-EAW-MJP Document 240 Filed 10/11/22 Page 7 of 13
reasonableness or documentation of expenses incurred will be subject to review by the
Court.
9.
Class Counsel shall, at or before the Settlement Hearing, file with the Court
proof of mailing of the Notice and Proof of Claim.
10.
The Court approves the form of the Summary Notice of Pendency of Class
Action, Proposed Settlement, and Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses (“Summary
Notice”) substantially in the form submitted to the Court at Dkt. 239-1, and directs that
Class Counsel shall cause the Summary Notice be transmitted over an international news
wire within thirty (30) days of the Notice Date. Class Counsel shall, at or before the
Settlement Hearing, file with the Court proof of publication of the Summary Notice.
11.
The form and content of the notice program described herein, and the
methods set forth herein of notifying the Settlement Class of the Settlement and its terms
and conditions, meet the requirements of Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,
and due process; constitute the best notice practicable under the circumstances; and shall
constitute due and sufficient notice to all persons and entities entitled thereto.
12.
In order to be eligible to receive a distribution from the Net Settlement Fund,
in the event the Settlement is effected in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth
in the Stipulation, each claimant shall take the following actions and be subject to the
following conditions:
(a)
A properly executed Proof of Claim, substantially in the form
submitted to the Court at Dkt. 239-1, must be submitted to the Claims Administrator, as
directed in the Notice, no later than seven (7) calendar days before the Settlement Hearing.
-7-
Case 6:14-cv-06631-EAW-MJP Document 240 Filed 10/11/22 Page 8 of 13
Such deadline may be further extended by Court order or by Class Counsel in their
discretion. Each Proof of Claim shall be deemed to have been submitted when postmarked
(if properly addressed and mailed by first-class or overnight mail, postage prepaid). Any
Proof of Claim submitted in any other manner, including online using the web-page for
the Settlement, or via email shall be deemed to have been submitted when it was actually
received by the Claims Administrator. Any Settlement Class Member who does not timely
submit a Proof of Claim within the time provided for shall be barred from sharing in the
distribution of the Net Settlement Fund, unless otherwise ordered by the Court or allowed
by Class Counsel, but shall remain bound by all determinations and judgments in this
Action concerning the Settlement, as provided by paragraph 15 of this Order.
(b)
The Proof of Claim submitted by each claimant must satisfy the
following conditions, unless otherwise allowed pursuant to the Stipulation: (i) it must be
properly completed, signed, and submitted in a timely manner in accordance with the
provisions of the preceding subparagraph; (ii) it must be accompanied by adequate
supporting documentation for the transactions reported therein, in the form of subscription
agreements, account statements, an authorized statement from the broker containing the
transactional information found in the broker’s records, or such other documentation as is
deemed adequate by the Claims Administrator and/or Class Counsel; (iii) if the person
executing the Proof of Claim is acting in a representative capacity, a certification of his or
her current authority to act on behalf of the claimant must be included in the Proof of
Claim; and (iv) the Proof of Claim must be complete and contain no material deletions or
-8-
Case 6:14-cv-06631-EAW-MJP Document 240 Filed 10/11/22 Page 9 of 13
modifications of any of the printed matter contained therein and must be signed under
penalty of perjury.
(c)
As part of the Proof of Claim, each claimant shall submit to the
jurisdiction of the Court with respect to the claim submitted.
13.
Any Settlement Class Member may enter an appearance in this Action, at his,
her or its own expense, individually or through counsel of his, her or its own choice. If any
Settlement Class Member does not enter an appearance, he, she, or it will be represented
by Class Counsel.
14.
Settlement Class Members shall be bound by all orders, determinations and
judgments in this Action concerning the Settlement, whether favorable or unfavorable,
unless such Persons request exclusion from the Settlement Class in a timely and proper
manner, as hereinafter provided. A putative Settlement Class Member wishing to make
such an exclusion request shall mail the request in written form by first-class mail to the
Claims Administrator at the address designated in the Notice for such exclusions, such that
it is received no later than twenty-one (21) calendar days prior to the Settlement Hearing.
Such request for exclusion must state the name, address, e-mail, and telephone number of
the Person seeking exclusion, must state that the sender requests to be “excluded from the
Settlement Class in Yao-Yi Liu, Tung-Hung Hsieh, and Chiu-Pao Tsai v. Wilmington Trust
Company, et al., No. 6:14-cv-06631 (W.D.N.Y.)” and must be signed by such Person. Such
Persons requesting exclusion are also directed to: (i) state the name, address, e-mail, and
telephone number of the person or entity requesting exclusion; (ii) state the amount of each
investment in the Bio Profit Funds, as well as the dates and prices of each such investment;
-9-
Case 6:14-cv-06631-EAW-MJP Document 240 Filed 10/11/22 Page 10 of 13
(iii) state the amount received as interest payments for each investment in the Bio Profit
Funds, as well as the dates and prices of each interest payment; (iv) the amount of each
sale of an investment in the Bio Profit Funds, as well as the dates and prices of each such
sale; and (v) be signed by the Person requesting exclusion or an authorized representative.
Alternatively, such Persons may submit copies of documentation showing this information.
Persons seeking exclusion with large holdings may be required by Class Counsel to submit
copies of documentation to the Claims Administrator. The request for exclusion shall not
be effective unless it provides the required information and is made within the time stated
above, or the exclusion is otherwise accepted by the Court.
15.
Putative Settlement Class Members requesting exclusion from the Settlement
Class shall not be eligible to receive any payment out of the Net Settlement Fund as
described in the Stipulation and Notice.
16.
The Court will consider any Settlement Class Member’s objection to the
Settlement, the Plan of Allocation, and/or the application for an award of attorneys’ fees or
expenses only if such Settlement Class Member has served by hand or by mail his, her or
its written objection and supporting papers, such that they are received on or before twentyone (21) calendar days before the Settlement Hearing, upon Class Counsel: Alan Rosca
and Paul Scarlato, Rosca Scarlato, LLC, 161 Washington Street, Suite 1025,
Conshohocken, PA 19428; and Defendant’s Counsel Representative: Melissa N. Subjeck,
Hodgson Russ LLP, 140 Pearl Street, Buffalo, NY 14202; and has filed said objections and
supporting papers with the Clerk of the Court, United States District Court, 100 State
Street, Rochester, NY 14614. Any Settlement Class Member who does not make his, her,
- 10 -
Case 6:14-cv-06631-EAW-MJP Document 240 Filed 10/11/22 Page 11 of 13
or its objection in the manner provided for in the Notice shall be deemed to have waived
such objection and shall forever be foreclosed from making any objection to any aspect of
the Settlement, to the Plan of Allocation, or to the request for attorneys’ fees and expenses,
and Service Award unless otherwise ordered by the Court, but shall otherwise be bound by
the Judgment to be entered and the releases to be given. Attendance at the hearing is not
necessary; however, persons wishing to be heard orally in opposition to the approval of the
Settlement, the Plan of Allocation, and/or the application for an award of attorneys’ fees
and other expenses and Service Award are required to indicate in their written objection
their intention to appear at the hearing. Persons who intend to object to the Settlement, the
Plan of Allocation, and/or the application for an award of attorneys’ fees and expenses and
Service Award and desire to present evidence at the Settlement Hearing must include in
their written objections the identity of any witnesses they may call to testify and exhibits
they intend to introduce into evidence at the Settlement Hearing.
17.
Settlement Class Members do not need to appear at the hearing or take any
other action to indicate their approval.
18.
Pending final determination of whether the Settlement should be approved,
Class Representatives, all Settlement Class Members, and each of them, and anyone who
acts or purports to act on their behalf, shall not institute, commence or prosecute any action
which asserts Released Claims against the Released Defendant Parties.
19.
All papers in support of the Settlement, Plan of Allocation, and Class
Counsel’s request for an award of attorneys’ fees and expenses and a Service Award shall
be filed with the Court and served on or before 35 calendar days prior to the date set herein
- 11 -
Case 6:14-cv-06631-EAW-MJP Document 240 Filed 10/11/22 Page 12 of 13
for the Settlement Hearing. If reply papers are necessary, they are to be filed with the Court
and served no later than seven calendar days prior to the Settlement Hearing.
20.
The passage of title and ownership of the Settlement Fund to the Escrow
Agent in accordance with the terms and obligations of the Stipulation is approved. No
person who is not a Settlement Class Member or Class Counsel shall have any right to any
portion of, or to any distribution of, the Net Settlement Fund unless otherwise ordered by
the Court or otherwise provided in the Stipulation.
21.
All funds held in escrow shall be deemed and considered to be in custodia
legis of the Court, and shall remain subject to the jurisdiction of the Court until such time
as such funds shall be disbursed pursuant to the Stipulation and/or further order of the
Court.
22.
Neither Defendants nor their counsel shall have any responsibility for the
Plan of Allocation or any application for attorney’s fees or expenses or Service Award
submitted by Class Counsel or Class Representatives, and such matters shall be considered
separately from the fairness, reasonableness, and adequacy of the Settlement.
23.
If the Settlement fails to become effective as defined in the Stipulation or is
terminated, then both the Stipulation, including any amendment(s) thereof, except as
expressly provided in the Stipulation, and this Preliminary Approval Order shall be null
and void, of no further force or effect, and without prejudice to any Party, and may not be
introduced as evidence or used in any actions or proceedings by any person or entity against
the Parties, and the Parties shall be deemed to have reverted to their respective litigation
positions in the Action as of August 11, 2022.
- 12 -
Case 6:14-cv-06631-EAW-MJP Document 240 Filed 10/11/22 Page 13 of 13
SO ORDERED.
________________________________
ELIZABETH A. WOLFORD
Chief Judge
United States District Court
Dated:
October 11, 2022
Rochester, New York
- 13 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?