Telesford v. Esgrow et al

Filing 35

ORDER, in response to plaintiff's request 34 , defendants' deposition of plaintiff is postponed until the Court issues a decision on 28 plaintiff's motion to compel. Scheduling Order deadlines are postponed, and a new Scheduling Order will be issued upon the resolution of plaintiff's motion to compel. Signed by Hon. Jonathan W. Feldman on 04/15/2016. (JKT)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
_______________________________
MARCUS TELESFORD
Plaintiff,

ORDER
15-cv-6191

v.
JAMES ESGROW, et al.,
Defendants.
______________________________
Currently pending before the Court is plaintiff’s motion to
compel

the

production

of

Compel (Docket # 28).

advise

the

needed.

documents.

See

Motion

to

The motion has been fully briefed and

submitted to the Court.
(Docket # 29).

certain

See Declaration (Docket # 27); Reply

The Court is reviewing the submissions and will

parties

if

it

determines

that

oral

argument

is

See Motion for a Hearing (Docket # 30); Order (Docket #

31).
The
discovery

standing
on

April

(Docket # 24).

Scheduling
29,

Order

2016.

See

calls
Amended

for

a

close

Scheduling

to

Order

In pursuit of that deadline, counsel for the

defense filed a notice to take plaintiff’s deposition by video,
scheduled for April 20, 2016.

See Notice (Docket ## 32, 33).

Plaintiff has asked by letter dated April 10, 2016, to postpone
the

deposition

until

his

motion

to

compel

With no objection from the defense, it is

has

been

decided.

ORDERED that the deposition of plaintiff shall be postponed
until the Court rules on the motion to compel, and it is further
ORDERED

that

the

current

Scheduling

Order

is

pending the Court’s decision on the motion to compel.

extended
The Court

will issue a new Scheduling Order upon entry of a decision.
SO ORDERED.

______________________________
JONATHAN W. FELDMAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Dated: April 15, 2016
Rochester, New York