Porter v. McDonnell et al
Filing
22
DECISION AND ORDER: Because the pro se Plaintiff is deceased and no individual has moved to substitute, this case is DISMISSED. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Frank P. Geraci, Jr. on 8/15/2018. (AFM)-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP-
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
JARVIS J. PORTER,
Plaintiff,
Case # 16-CV-6747-FPG
v.
ORDER DISMISSING CASE
T.J. McDONNELL, et al.,
Defendants.
BACKGROUND
On November 17, 2016, pro se Plaintiff Jarvis J. Porter brought this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 case
against Defendants. ECF No. 1. On March 12, 2018, Defendant Gary Carpino filed a Suggestion
of Death Upon the Record Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(a)(1), which indicated
that Plaintiff died on December 25, 2017. ECF No. 21. There has been no docket activity in this
case since.
DISCUSSION
Under Rule 25(a)(1):
If a party dies and the claim is not extinguished, the court may order
substitution of the proper party. A motion for substitution may be
made by any party or by the decedent’s successor or representative.
If the motion is not made within 90 days after service of a statement
noting the death, the action by or against the decedent must be
dismissed.
Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(a)(1) (emphasis added).
Here, Defendant filed a Suggestion of Death Upon the Record on March 12, 2018, and
therefore the 90-day period to file a motion to substitute expired on June 12, 2018. No party has
filed such a motion or otherwise indicated to the Court that it intends to do so, and therefore this
case must be dismissed pursuant to Rule 25(a)(1).
CONCLUSION
Because the pro se Plaintiff is deceased and no individual has moved to substitute, this case
is DISMISSED. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 15, 2018
Rochester, New York
______________________________________
HON. FRANK P. GERACI, JR.
Chief Judge
United States District Court
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?