Maldonado v. Krawczyk et al

Filing 50

DECISION AND ORDER Plaintiff's motions for preliminary injunctive relief 44 45 are denied; plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel 41 is denied, without prejudice. It is plaintiff's responsibility to retain an attorney or press forward with this lawsuit pro se. Signed by Hon. David G. Larimer on 6/27/2023. (KAH)This was mailed to: Plaintiff Edwin Maldonado.

Case 6:18-cv-06021-DGL-MWP Document 50 Filed 06/27/23 Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
___________________________________________
EDWIN MALDONADO,
DECISION AND ORDER
Plaintiff,
18-CV-6021DGL
v.

J. KRAWCZYK, et al.,
Defendants.
___________________________________________

Plaintiff’s motions for a preliminary injunctive relief (Dkt. #44, #45), are denied.
Plaintiff has not met the standard for such relief in this circuit. See Winter v. Natural Resources
Defense Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 20 (2008); Wright v. Giuliani, 230 F.3d 543, 547 (2000).
Plaintiff’s motion for appointment of counsel (Dkt. #41) is likewise denied, without
prejudice. It is plaintiff’s responsibility to retain an attorney or press forward with this lawsuit
pro se. See 28 U.S.C. § 1654.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

_______________________________________
DAVID G. LARIMER
United States District Judge
Dated: Rochester, New York
June 27, 2023.