Association For Molecular Pathology et al v. United States Patent and Trademark Office et al
MEMORANDUM ENDORSEMENT re: 97 Motion for Leave to File Brief Amicus Curiae. ORDER granting 97 Motion to File Amicus Brief. ENDORSEMENT: So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Robert W. Sweet on 8/31/09) (db)
UNITED STATES DIST
ASSOCIATION FOR MOLECULAR PATHOLOGY et al.,
: 09-CV-4515 (RWS)
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK : MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE OFFICE; et al., : BRIEF AMICUS CURIAE
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that proposed Amici Curiae March of Dimes Foundation, Canavan Foundation, Claire Altman Heine Foundation, Massachusetts Breast Cancer Coalition, National Organization for Rare Disorders, and National Tay-Sachs & Allied Diseases Association shall move this Court, before the Honorable Robert W. Sweet, United States District Judge, at the United States Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, New York, New York at a date and time to be determined by the Court, for leave to file a brief amic~rs curiae. Attached hereto are: (I) Memorandum of Law in Support of this Motion for Leave to File a proposed brief amicus curiae, (2) proposed Order granting leave to file the proposed brief amicru curiae, and (3) the proposed brief amicus curiae. Dated: August 26, 2009 DEWEY & LEBOEUF LLP By: Is1 Mark D. Shtilerman Barbara A. Caulfield (pending pro hac vice) Michael J . Malecek (pending pro hac vice) Stephen C. Holmes (pending pro hac vice) Mark D. Shtilerman Dewey & LeBoeuf LLP 1301 Avenue of Americas New York, NY 10019-6092 2 12-259-8000 (phone) 2 12-259-6333 (fax) email@example.com firstname.lastname@example.org email@example.com firstname.lastname@example.org
Altorneys for Amici Curiae, March of Dinres Foundalion, Canavan Foundalion, Claire Allman Heine Formdalion, Massachusells Breasl Cancer Coalilion, Nalional Organira/ionfor Rare Disorders, Nalional Tay-Sachs & Allied Diseases Associalion
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?