Algea v. Government Employees Insurance Company

Filing 11

ORDER DENYING TRANSFER re: pldg. ( 16 in MDL No. 2746, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-01787, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-01788, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-01807, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-01809, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-01815, 8 in NYE/2:16- cv-01817, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-01827, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-01834, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-01854, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-01860, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-01863, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-01874, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-01970, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-01971, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-01972, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-01974, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-01976, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-01977, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-01981, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-01983, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-01990, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-01991, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02076, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02078, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02081, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02083, 8 in NYE/2 :16-cv-02084, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02086, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02088, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02092, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02127, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02129, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02131, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02132, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02135, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02136, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-021 38, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02140, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02142, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02147, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02150, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02160, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02161, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02162, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02168, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02169, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02173, 8 in N YE/2:16-cv-02174, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02181, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02200, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02202, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02237, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02242, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02246, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02248, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02306, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02308, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv -02310, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02341, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02344, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02347, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02351, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02352, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02355, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02358, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02361, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02406, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02415, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02416, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02421, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02423, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02424, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02426, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02428, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02443, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02444, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02445, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02448, 8 in NYE/2:1 6-cv-02451, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02657, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02701, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02702, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02704, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02705, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02734, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02736, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02738, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02739, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02761 , 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02764, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02766, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02767, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02768, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02776, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02778, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02779, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02782, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02832, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02882, 8 in NYE /2:16-cv-02884, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02885, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02887, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02889, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02891, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02898, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02900, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02902, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02903, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02904, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-0 2912, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02915, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02916, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02917, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02918, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02962, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-02965, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-03003, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-03005, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-03007, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-03030, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-03031, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-03032, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-03041, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-03044, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-03046, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-03047, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-03055, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-03056, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-03088, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-03091, 8 in NYE/2:16- cv-03104, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-03106, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-03109, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-03111, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-03194, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-03196, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-03198, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-03200, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-03204, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-03280, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-03281, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-03286, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-03289, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-03304, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-03307, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-03308, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-03309, 8 in NYE/2:16-cv-03312, 8 in VAE/2:16-cv-00430), ( 2 in MDL No. 2746), ( 3 in MDL No. 2746), ( 6 in MDL No. 2746), ( 5 i n MDL No. 2746), ( 1 in MDL No. 2746), ( 4 in MDL No. 2746) The motion to transfer, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, is DENIEDSigned by Judge Sarah S. Vance, Chair, PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION, on 12/7/2016. Associated Cases: MDL No. 2746 et al. (SM)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION IN RE: GEICO TELEPHONE CLAIM REPRESENTATIVES FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT (FLSA) AND WAGE AND HOUR LITIGATION MDL No. 2746 ORDER DENYING TRANSFER Before the Panel: Defendant Government Employees Insurance Company (GEICO) moves under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to centralize pretrial proceedings in this litigation in the Eastern District of New York. This litigation consists of 149 actions pending in two districts, as listed on Schedule A. All plaintiffs oppose centralization of these actions. On the basis of the papers filed and hearing session held, we conclude that centralization is not necessary for the convenience of the parties and witnesses or to further the just and efficient conduct of the litigation. These actions share allegations that GEICO fails to pay its telephone claim representative (TCR) employees wages for overtime in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act. But the disparate procedural posture of these cases suggests that centralization would not result in an efficient outcome for this litigation. The 148 actions pending in the Eastern District of New York stem from the decertification of a collective action that has been pending since 2009. See Harper v. GEICO, C.A. No. 2:09-2254 (E.D.N.Y.). The parties to that action engaged in common discovery and pretrial motions practice, and a trial in Harper was scheduled to begin in September 2016. That action, along with the 148 actions that stem from it, now has been stayed pending mediation among all the Eastern District of New York plaintiffs and GEICO. In contrast, the Eastern District of Virginia Clinton action is in its nascent stages. GEICO argues that a decision on certification of a collective action in the Eastern District of Virginia Clinton action could conflict with the decertification ruling in the Harper action. But Clinton proposes a much narrower collective class of TCRs limited to GEICO’s Virginia Beach, Virginia location, than the decertified Harper action, which proposed a collective class of all TCRs employed by GEICO nationwide. Further, while Clinton will require pretrial motion practice regarding certification of a collective class, the individual actions in the Eastern District of New York will not, further increasing the procedural disparity among the actions. Given the advanced state of proceedings in those individual actions, that all actions are before two judges, and that there are only two groups of plaintiffs’ counsel in all actions, informal coordination of the new Eastern District of Virginia action with the actions pending in the Eastern District of New York is feasible and a preferable alternative to centralization. See In re: Dollar Tree Stores, Inc., Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) & Wage & Hour Litig., 829 F. Supp. 2d 1376, 1377 (J.P.M.L. 2011). -2IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the motion for centralization of these actions is denied. PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION __________________________________________ Sarah S. Vance Chair Marjorie O. Rendell Lewis A. Kaplan R. David Proctor Charles R. Breyer Ellen Segal Huvelle Catherine D. Perry IN RE: GEICO TELEPHONE CLAIM REPRESENTATIVES FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT (FLSA) AND WAGE AND HOUR LITIGATION MDL No. 2746 SCHEDULE A Eastern District of New York ALGEA v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-01787 AULOV v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-01788 SCHOLL v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-01807 TENNENT v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-01809 BEHM v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-01815 BERNARD v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-01817 BROUSSARD v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-01827 DAVIS v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-01834 DANIELS v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-01854 BUTCHER v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-01860 CARACCIOLA v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-01863 CLINE v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-01874 BANK v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-01970 CARR v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-01971 CHAMBERS v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-01972 COPELAND v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-01974 CURRAN v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY C.A. No. 2:16-01976 CROSBY v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-01977 - A2 MDL No. 2746 Schedule A (Continued) Eastern District of New York (Cont.) DAVIS v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-01981 DEGOUVILLE v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-01983 BOARD v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-01990 DEAN v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-01991 DEODENE v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02076 EVANS v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02078 FLOYD v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02081 FULLER v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02083 GRIFFITH v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02084 HARVIN v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02086 HATTON v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02088 HAYES v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02092 BAKER v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02127 EISENBERG v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02129 IEZZA v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02131 JACOBS v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02132 JEDLICA v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02135 JOHNSON v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02136 KELLY v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02138 - A3 MDL No. 2746 Schedule A (Continued) Eastern District of New York (Cont.) KUEHL v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02140 KUROV v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02142 LAUER v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02147 PICKETT v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02150 DRAPER MALLORY v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02160 HER v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02161 HERNANDEZ v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02162 HOYT v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02168 HUNT v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02169 MCCORMICK v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02173 MECABE v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02174 SAUNDERS v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02181 CALDERON v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02200 MCFADDEN v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02202 FELICIANO v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02237 FIGERT v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02242 HARRIS v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02246 HODGES v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02248 HARNED v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02306 - A4 MDL No. 2746 Schedule A (Continued) Eastern District of New York (Cont.) HUFF v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02308 HUTTO v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02310 LUPO v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02341 MAGUIRE v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02344 MARLAR v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02347 MATTHEWS v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02351 MCCARTHY v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02352 MORROW v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02355 NYILAS v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02358 PATTERSON v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02361 BENJAMIN v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02406 BOWLIN v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02415 MYERS v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02416 PELLER v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02421 NELSON v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02423 RAK v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02424 ROBERTS v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02426 ROSS v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02428 JOSEPH v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02443 - A5 MDL No. 2746 Schedule A (Continued) Eastern District of New York (Cont.) LEWIS-LAROSSA v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02444 MADISON-CONNER v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02445 MORALES v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02448 SCOTT v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02451 SIMPKIN v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02657 SKELTON v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02701 SMITH v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02702 SMITH v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02704 SMITH v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02705 KIRKLAND v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02734 MCCUMBER v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02736 SOMRA v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02738 SPENCER v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02739 SULLIVAN v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02761 TANNER v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02764 TORRES v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02766 VAN ORDEN v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02767 VELEZ v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02768 VOTTO v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02776 - A6 MDL No. 2746 Schedule A (Continued) Eastern District of New York (Cont.) WAISOME v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02778 WARD v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02779 WELDON v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02782 SCHOTT v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02832 BANWARTH v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02882 ERDODY v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02884 HILL v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02885 ISAAC v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02887 KNOECK v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02889 RUTH v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02891 SIMMONS v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02898 TRUONG v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02900 WEST v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02902 WHITELY v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02903 WILLIAMS v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02904 WILLIAMS v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02912 WINTERS v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02915 WRIGHT v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02916 YOUNG v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02917 - A7 MDL No. 2746 Schedule A (Continued) Eastern District of New York (Cont.) ZINNO v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02918 RICKARDS v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02962 POTTINGER v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-02965 MIDDLEBROOKS v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-03003 MULLINS v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-03005 NAZARI v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-03007 AKERS v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-03030 ANDERSON v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-03031 DUBE v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-03032 GREER v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-03041 HERNANDEZ v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-03044 KEGHLIAN v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-03046 RILEY DIXON v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-03047 NESMITH v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-03055 NOMIKOS v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-03056 OBLAK v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-03088 RODRIGUEZ v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-03091 ROMERO v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-03104 SALIM v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-03106 - A8 MDL No. 2746 Schedule A (Continued) Eastern District of New York (Cont.) TILLMAN v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-03109 YANCEY v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-03111 FORESMAN v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-03194 ACOSTA v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-03196 HOFFMAN v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-03198 MCDONALD v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-03200 ATKINSON v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-03204 MICHALIC v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-03280 MORGAN v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-03281 NANCE v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-03286 O'MALLEY v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-03289 RAMSEY v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-03304 MAY v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-03307 SOTO v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-03308 WHIDDON v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-03309 DOLFO v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-03312 Eastern District of Virginia CLINTON, ET AL. v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, C.A. No. 2:16-00430

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?