Askew v. Methodist Home for Children

Filing 32

MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 29 MOTION to Strike 28 Memorandum in Opposition to Defendant's Reply Memorandum to Plaintiff's Memorandum in Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Methodist Home for Children, 19 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Methodist Home for Children Objections to M&R due by 2/26/2009. Signed by USMJ William A. Webb on 2/10/09. (Attachments: # 1 Notice) (Lee, B.)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA NORTHERN DIVISION CASE NO. 2:07-CV-53BR Sharon W. Askew, Plaintiff, v. Methodist Home for Children, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NOTICE Attached to this notice is a memorandum and recommendation of a United States Magistrate Judge in this action that has been entered on the records of this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(c), Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b)(2)-(3), and Local Civil Rule 72.4(b), EDNC. Rule 72(b) provides as follows: (2) Objections. Within 10 days after being served with a copy of the recommended disposition, a party may serve and file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations. A party may respond to another party's objections within 10 days after being served with a copy. Unless the district judge orders otherwise, the objecting party must promptly arrange for transcribing the record, or whatever portions of it the parties agree to or the magistrate judge considers sufficient. (3) Resolving Objections. The district judge must determine de novo any part of the magistrate judge's disposition that has been properly objected to. The district judge may accept, reject, or modify the recommended decision; receive further evidence; or return the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions. You are hereby notified that unless written objections in accordance with this rule are filed within 10 days after receipt of this memorandum and recommendation, you will have waived the right to further consideration of these issues by the district judge, and an appropriate order based on the memorandum and recommendation will be entered. Furthermore, failure to file timely objections to the findings and recommendation set forth by the magistrate judge may result in a waiver of the right to appeal from a judgment of this court based on such findings and recommendations. See Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841 (4th Cir. 1985). Date Filed: 2/11/09 /s/ DENNIS P. IAVARONE CLERK OF COURT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?