Howard v. College of the Albemarle et al
Filing
102
JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the court GRANTS defendants' motion for summary judgment [D.E. 38], DENIES as moot plaintiffs motion under Rule 56( d) [D.E. 46], GRANTS defendants' motions to seal [D.E. 73, 99], GRANTS p laintiffs motions to seal [D.E. 79, 87, 95], DENIES plaintiffs motion to compel and for sanctions [D.E. 83], DENIES plaintiffs motion to depose two witnesses [D.E. 84], GRANTS defendants' motion for leave to file a brief in excess often pages [D .E. 89], and DENIES defendants' motion to strike [D.E. 97]. Defendants may file a motion for costs in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and this court's local rules. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 3/27/2017. (Briggeman, N.)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
NORTHERN DIVISION
ROBERT HOWARD,
Plaintiff,
V.
COLLEGE OF THE ALBEMARLE,
and KANDI DEITEMEYER,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE
CASE NO. 2:15-cv-39-D
Decision by the Court.
IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the court GRANTS defendants' motion
for summary judgment [D.E. 38], DENIES as moot plaintiffs motion under Rule 56( d) [D.E.
46], GRANTS defendants' motions to seal [D.E. 73, 99], GRANTS plaintiffs motions to seal
[D.E. 79, 87, 95], DENIES plaintiffs motion to compel and for sanctions [D.E. 83], DENIES
plaintiffs motion to depose two witnesses [D.E. 84], GRANTS defendants' motion for leave to
file a brief in excess often pages [D.E. 89], and DENIES defendants' motion to strike [D.E. 97].
Defendants may file a motion for costs in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
and this court's local rules.
This Judgment Filed and Entered on March 27, 2017, and Copies To:
Robert Howard
(Sent to 309 N. Estes Drive Chapel Hill, NC
27514 via US Mail)
John D. Leidy
(via CM/ECF electronic notification)
DATE:
PETER A. MOORE, JR., CLERK
March 27, 2017
(By) /s/ Nicole Briggeman
Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?