United States of America v. Griffin's Personal Property et al
ORDER regarding 12 Motion under Rule G(5)(A) and G(4). The Court construes Griffin's pro se motion [DE 12] as an answer to the complaint for forfeiture in rem pursuant to Rule G(5)(b). Signed by US District Judge Terrence W. Boyle on 10/3/2017. Copy sent to Harold Griffin via US Mail to 210 Executive Drive, Elizabeth City, NC 27907. (Stouch, L.)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
GRIFFIN'S PERSONAL PROPERTY,
SPECIFICALLY DESCRIBED AS: A
2010 CADILLAC CTS,
VIN: 1G6DP8EV8A0106278, AND ANY )
AND ALL PROCEEDS FROM THE SALE)
OF SAID PROPERTY,
This civil forfeiture action comes before the Court on a motion by claimant Harold Griffin,
Jr. under Rule G(5)(a) and G(4) of the Supplemental Rules for Admiralty or Maritime Claims and
Asset Forfeiture Actions. In the motion Griffin contends that he has an interest of ownership in
the property and seeks the lifting of the injunction from his property or a hearing thereon. Griffin
has also filed a claim under Rule G(5)(a). Accordingly, the Court construes Griffin's prose motion
[DE 12] as an answer to the complaint for forfeiture in rem pursuant to Rule G(5)(b). The clerk is
DIRECTED to request from the parties a discovery plan and to correct the docket consistent with
SO ORDERED, this~ day of October, 2017.
NCE W. BOYLE
UNITED STATES DISTRIC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?