United States of America v. Griffin's Personal Property et al
ORDER granting 25 Motion to Strike; denying as moot 17 Motion to Strike; and denying 23 Motion. Signed by US District Judge Terrence W. Boyle on 8/23/2018. Copy sent to Harold Griffin atCraven Correctional Institution via US Mail to P.O. Box 839, Vanceboro, NC 28586. (Stouch, L.)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
GRIFFIN'S PERSONAL PROPERTY,
SPECIFICALLY DESCRIBED AS: A 2010
CADILLAC CTS, VIN: 1G6DP8EV8A0106278,
AND ANY AND ALL ATTACHMENTS '
THEREON; AND ANY AND ALL PROCEEDS
FROM THE SALE OF SAID PROPERTY,
This matter is before the Court on the government's renewed motion to strike the putative
claimant's claim and answer [DE 25], as well as the putative claimant's motion [DE 23]. For the
following reasons, the government's motion is GRANTED and the claimant's motion is
On April 28, 2017, the government first sought forfeiture of the vehicle in this case. The
government served the potential claimant, Harold Clyde Griffin, on May 30, 2017. Griffin, who
is proceeding pro se, filed a motion indicating he had an interest of ownership in the property.
[DE 12]. The Court construed the motion as an answer to the original complaint for forfeiture
proceeding initic~ted by the government. [DE 14]. Griffin also filed a claim on the property. [DE
13]. That claim was not signed under the penalty of perjury, which is mandated by the Rule
G(5)(a)(i)(c) of the Supplemental Rules for Certain Admiralty and Maritime Claims. The
government then moved to strike Griffin's answer and claim because of this omission. [DE 17].
Rather than striking the claim and answer, this Court granted Griffin 14 days to file a new
claim signed under penalty of perjury. [DE 19]. Instead of doing so, Griffin, or an unidentified
third party who is not his lawyer, filed the two motions asking for an extension, for appointment
of counsel and for copies of court documents without payment of fees. [DE 20, 21]. The Court
denied the motions without prejudice, granting Griffin an additional 14 days to file a proper
motion. [DE 22]. Griffin then filed the instant motion. [DE 23].
Griffin's motion, unlike his previous motions, was signed under penalty of perjury and
served on the government, thought it was filed outside of the 14-day window granted by this
Court. The fundamental flaw in the motion, though, is that it is not a claim. See Supplemental
Rule G(S)(a)(i)(A)-(B). In fact, it does not appear to move for anything at all.
Griffin has still never filed a proper claim, despite repeated warnings from this Court that
failure to do so would result in the striking of his claim and answer. [DE 19; DE 22].iFor that
reason, Griffin's purported claim is stricken for failure to comply with Supplemental Rule
G(S)(a), and so Griffin's answer is stricken for lack of standing, in keeping with Rule G(8)(i)(B).
The government's renewed motion to strike is GRANTED [DE 25]. The government's previous
motion to strike [DE 17] is DENIED AS MOOT. Griffin's motion [DE 23] is DENIED.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDG
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?