Perry et al v. Britt

Filing 30

ORDER denying 23 Motion for a restraining order and relief from the judgment. Signed by District Judge James C. Dever III on 10/27/2018. Sent to Adam L. Perry at 600 Swamp Road Hertford, NC 27944 via US Mail. (Sellers, N.)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA NORTHERN DIVISION No. 2:17-CV-54-D ADAM L. PERRY, Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM EARL BRITT, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER On November 16, 2017, the United States removed a contempt motion Perry filed in Perquimans County Superior Court to this court [D .E. 1]. On December 20, 2017, the United States moved to dismiss the action pursuantto Federal Ru1e of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1 ), (5), and (6) [D.E. 14]. On May 11, 2018, the court denied Perry's motion for contempt and denied the remaining motions as moot [D.E. 19], and the clerk entered judgment [D.E. 20]. On June 15,2018, Perry filed motions for a restraining order and relief from the judgment [D.E. 23]. On Ju1y 2, 2018, the United States filed a response in opposition to the motions [D.E. 24]. On Ju1y 9, 2018, Perry filed a notice of appeal [D .E. 25]. On October 25, 2018, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed [D.E. 28]. The court has considered Perry's motions under the governing standards. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b), 65; Winterv. Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 20 (2008);Aikensv. Ingram, 652 F.3d 496, 500-01 (4th Cir. 2011) (en bane); Real Truth About Obama. Inc. v. FEC, 575 F.3d 342, 346 (4th Cir. 2009), vacated on other grounds, 559 U.S. 1089 (2010), reissued in relevant part, 607 F.3d 355 (4th Cir. 2010) (per curiam); U.S. Dep't of Labor v. WolfRun Mining Co., 452 F.3d 275, 281 n.1 (4th Cir. 2006). The motions lack merit and are DENIED. SO ORDERED. This~ gay of October 2018. United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?