Dunn v. City of Rocky Mount, North Carolina et al

Filing 35

JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED in accordance with the court's order entered June 16, 2011, that defendant Moseley is entitled to qualified immunity and public officer's immunity, the City defendant is entitled to governmenta l immunity and that plaintiff has failed to put forward evidence substantiating his § 1983 or intentional tort claims. Defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. The plaintiff shall have and recover nothing from this action. Signed by Dennis P. Iavarone, Clerk of Court on 06/20/2011. (Baker, C.)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA EASTERN DIVISION KEITH OTIS DUNN, Plaintiff, v. DONALD MOSLEY, Officer, Rocky Mount Police Department, individually and in his official capacity; and CITY OF ROCKY MOUNT, NORTH NORTH CAROLINA, ROCKY MOUNT POLICE DEPARTMENT, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) JUDGMENT No. 4:10-CV-28-FL Decision by Court. This action came before the Honorable Louise W. Flanagan, Chief United States District Judge, for consideration of defendants’ motion for summary judgment. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED in accordance with the court’s order entered June 16, 2011, that defendant Moseley is entitled to qualified immunity and public officer’s immunity, the City defendant is entitled to governmental immunity and that plaintiff has failed to put forward evidence substantiating his § 1983 or intentional tort claims. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. The plaintiff shall have and recover nothing from this action. This Judgment Filed and Entered on June 20, 2011, and Copies To: Brian K. McDaniel (via CM/ECF Notice of Electronic Filing) Thomas Franklin Loflin, III (via CM/ECF Notice of Electronic Filing) J. Nicholas Ellis (via CM/ECF Notice of Electronic Filing) June 20, 2011 DENNIS P. IAVARONE, CLERK /s/ Christa N. Baker (By) Christa N. Baker, Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?