LYTTLE v. The UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al

Filing 92

ORDER granting 91 Stipulation and Joint Motion to Dismiss. In light of this disposition, the 75 memorandum and recommendation is VACATED as moot. Signed by Chief Judge James C. Dever III on 10/2/2012. (Sawyer, D.)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

EASTERN DNISION

No.4:1O-CV-142-D

MARK DANIEL LYTTLE,
Plaintiff,

v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
et al.,
Defendants.

)

)

)

)
)
)
)
)
)

)

ORDER

Pursuant to the parties stipulation and joint motion for dismissal with prejudice, filed on
October 2,2012, and in accordance with Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and for
good cause shown, plaintiff's amended complaint and all actions and claims contained therein are
hereby dismissed, with prejudice, as to all federal defendants: the United States of America,
Dashanta Faucette, Dean Caputo, and Robert Kendall. Each party shall bear their own respective
costs, expenses, and attorney's fees.
In light of this disposition, the memorandum and recommendation ofNovember 14,2011
[D.E. 75] is VACATED as moot. See United States v. Munsingwear. Inc., 340 U.S. 36, 39-41
(1950).
SO ORDERED. This ~ day of October 2012.