Sirsi Corporation v. Craven-Pamlico-Carteret Regional Library System

Filing 12

MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 7 First MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12 (b)(6)First MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12 (b)(6), 8 Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim by Sirsi Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (Numbers, Robert)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA EASTERN DIVISION Civil Action No. 4:11-cv-00059-BO SIRSI CORPORATION d/b/a SIRSIDYNIX, Plaintiff, v. CRAVEN-PAMLICO-CARTERET REGIONAL LIBRARY SYSTEM, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME IN WHICH TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT’S COUNTERCLAIMS AND MOTION TO DISMISS Plaintiff, by and through counsel, moves the Court for an extension of time in which to reply to Defendant’s Counterclaims and Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Rule 6 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. In support of this motion, Plaintiff states as follows: 1. On April 15, 2011, Plaintiff filed a complaint against Defendant. 2. Defendant filed its Answer and Counterclaims on June 17, 2011. 3. On June 17, 2011, Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss. 4. The deadline for Plaintiff to reply to Defendant’s Counterclaims and Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is July 11, 2011. 5. The time for Plaintiff to reply has not expired. 6. Plaintiff moves for an extension of time, up to and through July 22, 2011 in which to file and serve its replies. 7. Additional time is needed to investigate the claims raised in Defendant’s Counterclaims and examine the law applicable thereto. Similarly, additional time is necessary to analyze the law applicable to Defendant’s motion to dismiss and prepare a response. 8. Counsel for Plaintiff has conferred with Defendant’s counsel and Defendant’s counsel consents to Plaintiff’s motion for extension of time. 9. This motion is made in good faith and not for the purpose of delay. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff requests the Court grant it an extension of time up to and through July 22, 2011, in which to serve and file its replies to Defendant’s Counterclaims and Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. This the 6th day of July, 2011. WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE A Professional Limited Liability Company By: 2 /s/ Robert T. Numbers II________________ ROBERT T. NUMBERS, II (N.C. State Bar No. 34134) 150 Fayetteville Street, Suite 2100 Post Office Box 831 Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 (919) 755-2100 (919) 755-6067 (facsimile) Attorney for Plaintiff CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE This is to certify that on July 6, 2011, a copy of the foregoing was filed electronically with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filing to the following: Lee W. Bettis , Jr. The Bettis Law Firm P. O. Box 848 New Bern, NC 28560 Email: lwbettis@hotmail.com Attorney for Defendant WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE A Professional Limited Liability Company By: 3 /s/ Robert T. Numbers II________________ ROBERT T. NUMBERS, II (N.C. State Bar No. 34134) 150 Fayetteville Street, Suite 2100 Post Office Box 831 Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 (919) 755-2100 (919) 755-6067 (facsimile) Attorney for Plaintiff

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?