Locust v. Perry et al
ORDER denying 7 Motion for the Court to Refuse Any Request for Extension of Time to Answer - Finding as Moot 11 Motion for Legal Action Without Delay - Denying 12 Motion for the FBI to Begin Investigating - Denying 14 Motion for Default Judgment - Denying 15 Motion for Default Judgment and Finding as Moot 23 Motion for Conspiracy. Signed by Senior Judge Malcolm J. Howard on 11/14/12. Copy mailed to pro se plaintiff via US Mail. (Lee, L.)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
ELDER DEFORRORRA LOCUST,
LENERZA PERRY and LENOIR
This matter is before the court on various motions filed by
extension of time to answer [DE #7]
investigation [DE #12]
(2) motion for legal action
(4) motions for default judgment
(5) motion of conspiracy [DE #23] .
As to the plaintiff's motion for the court to refuse any
request for an extension of time to answer, the court cannot say
now how it may rule on a future motion that has not and may not
Therefore, this motion is DENIED [DE #7].
motion for legal action without delay,
As to the
the court acts on each
expeditious a manner as possible considering the court's docket,
deemed moot [DE #11} .
there is no evidence in the record which would
constitute good cause for such motion.
[DE #12] is DENIED.
However, plaintiff has filed no proof that service has been made
upon the named defendants.
default [DE #14 and #15] are DENIED.
plaintiff's motions for
Also before the court is
the plaintiff's motion for
As the motions for default judgment have been
I~ -day of November 2012.
Senior United States District Judge
At Greenville, NC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?