Kennedy v. Federal National Mortgage Association et al
Filing
22
JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the removal was improper, and the case is REMANDED to Pitt County Superior Court, Greenville, NC. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c), the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to mail a certified copy of thi s order of remand to the Clerk of Pitt County Superior Court. The pending motions to dismiss [DE-9, -13] are DENIED as moot, butwithout prejudice to raise them again in state court. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this case. Signed by Jacqueline B. Grady, Deputy Clerk for Julie A. Richards, Clerk of Court, on 8/11/2014. (Grady, B.)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
EASTERN DIVISION
KATHRYN KENNEDY,
Plaintiff,
v.
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE
ASSOCIATION and BROCK AND
SCOTT, PLLC,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
JUDGMENT
No. 4:13-CV-203-F
Decision by Court.
This action came before the Honorable James C. Fox, Senior United States District Judge, for ruling
as follows:
IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the removal was improper, and the case
is REMANDED to Pitt County Superior Court, Greenville, NC. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 1447(c),
the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to mail a certified copy of this order of remand to the Clerk of Pitt
County Superior Court. The pending motions to dismiss [DE-9, -13] are DENIED as moot, but
without prejudice to raise them again in state court. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this
case.
This Judgment Filed and Entered on August 11, 2014, and Copies To:
Jeremy Clayton King (CM/ECF Notice of Electronic Filing)
Steven F. Johnson, II (CM/ECF Notice of Electronic Filing)
Mark Stephen Asbill (CM/ECF Notice of Electronic Filing)
Gregory David Spink (CM/ECF Notice of Electronic Filing)
DATE
JULIE A. RICHARDS, CLERK
August 11, 2014
/s/ Jacqueline B. Grady
(By) Jacqueline B. Grady, Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?