Thomas v. Colvin
Filing
50
CONSENT ORDER granting 49 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Swank on 3/12/2015. (Foell, S.)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
EASTERN DIVISION
No. 4:13-cv-225-KS
VETTA THOMAS,
Plaintiff,
v.
CAROLYN COLVIN,
Acting Commissioner of Social
Security,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CONSENT ORDER
This action being submitted to the Court for entry of a Consent Order agreed to by the
parties and it appearing that Plaintiff, by and through her attorney, has executed this Consent
Order and Defendant has executed this Consent Order, by and through the undersigned Assistant
United States Attorney; and it appearing that the parties have agreed that the Commissioner of
Social Security should pay the sum of $5,500.00 for attorney fees, in full and final settlement of
all claims due against the Social Security Administration, for attorney fees and costs arising
under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA). 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d).
It is therefore ORDERED that the Commissioner of Social Security pay to Plaintiff’s attorney
$5,500.00 for attorney fees if there is no debt that qualifies under the Treasury Offset Program (31
U.S.C. § 3716). If there is such a debt, any fee remaining after offset will be payable to Plaintiff
and delivered to Plaintiff’s attorney.
March
This _____ day of ______________, 2015.
12th
_________________________________
United States Magistrate Judge
CONSENTED TO:
/s/CHARLOTTE W. HALL
Attorney for Plaintiff
N.C. Bar # 41290
Charles T. Hall Law Firm, P.C.
P.O. Box 10629
Raleigh, NC 27605
Telephone: (919) 791-1883
Fax: (919) 791-1886
charlotte@charleshallfirm.com
/s/CASSIA W. PARSON
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Social Security Administration
6401 Security Boulevard
Room 617, Altmeyer Building
Baltimore, Maryland 21235
Telephone: (410) 966-0446
Fax: (410) 597-1435
Cassia.parson@ssa.gov
Maryland Bar
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?