Fulton v. Coleman et al
ORDER denying 23 Motion for Reconsideration ; denying 23 Motion to Reopen Case. Signed by Chief Judge James C. Dever III on 7/9/2014. Copy sent to the plaintiff via US Mail. (Edwards, S.)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
ISAAC HANNAH COLEMAN, et al.,
On July 7, 2014, Steven N. Fulton filed a motion for reconsideration. See [D.E. 23]. The
court has considered the motion for reconsideration under the governing standard. See, ~'
Zinkand v. Brown, 478 F.3d634, 637 (4th Cir. 2007); Bogartv. Chapell, 396F.3d 548,555 (4thCir.
2005); Hill v. Braxton, 277 F.3d 701, 708 (4th Cir. 2002); Pac. Ins. Co. v. Am. Nat'l Fire Ins. Co.,
148 F.3d 396,403 (4th Cir. 1998); Hughes v. Bedsole, 48 F.3d 1376, 1382 (4th Cir. 1995); Collison
v. Int'l Chern. Workers Union, 34 F.3d 233, 236 (4th Cir. 1994); Hutchinson v. Staton, 994 F.2d
1076, 1081 (4th Cir. 1993). The motion [D.E. 23] lacks merit and is DENIED.
SO ORDERED. This _:t_ day of July 2014.
Chief United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?