Fulton v. Coleman et al
ORDER denying 29 Second Motion for Reconsideration and 26 Motion for Sanctions. Fulton is WARNED, however, that if he makes any more baseless filings in this court, this court will impose sanctions. Signed by Chief Judge James C. Dever III on 9/19/2014. (Tripp, S.)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
ISAAC HANNAH COLEMAN,
NEW ENGLAND MOTOR FREIGHT,
ABC CORP., and JOHN DOES 1-3,
On August 5, 2014, defendants filed a motion for sanctions [D .E. 26]. On August 13, 2014,
Steven W. Fulton filed a motion for reconsideration [D.E. 29].
The motion for reconsideration [D.E. 29] is baseless and is DENIED.
Brown, 478 F.3d 634, 637 (4th Cir. 2007); Bogart v. Chapell, 396 F.3d 548, 555 (4th Cir. 2005).
The court understands defendants' frustration with Fulton and the motion for sanctions.
Nonetheless, having fully considered the entire record, the motion [D.E. 26] is DENIED. Fulton
is WARNED, however, that if he makes any more baseless filings in this court, this court will
SO ORDERED. This _1j day of September 2014.
:::::1: .. . . Jj -" V.o.A
Chief United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?