Green v. Monette, et al

Filing 6

ORDER adopting 4 Memorandum and Recommendation - All federal claims are dismissed, the court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over remaining state law claims, and where her attempted removal of an ongoing state criminal case fails, that case is remanded to the North Carolina General Court of Justice, Pitt County, for further proceedings. The clerk is directed to close the file. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 07/22/2014. (Baker, C.)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA EASTERN DIVISION NO. 4:14-CV-20-FL GEORGIA ARNETTE GREEN, Plaintiff, v. J.B. MONETTE, Individually; SHERIFF NEIL ELKS, Individually; CRAIG F. GOESS, INC., doing business as Greenville Toyota; CRAIG F. GOESS, SR.; CRAIG F. GOESS, JR.; THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; PITT COUNTY; KIMBERLY ROBB, Pitt County Elect District Attorney; JAMES SAUNDERS, Assistant District Attorney; and PITT COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT JUDGES, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER This court has carefully reviewed the memorandum and recommendation of the magistrate judge on frivolity review of plaintiff's expansive allegations memorialized in complaint extending over 350 pages, to which no objection has been made. Finding no error, the court adopts as its own, for those reasons therein stated, the proposed conclusions of the magistrate judge. All federal claims are dismissed, the court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over remaining state law claims, and where her attempted removal of an ongoing state criminal case fails, that case is remanded to the North Carolina General Court of Justice, Pitt County, for further proceedings. The clerk is directed to close the file. SO ORDERED, this the 22nd day of July, 2014. _____________________________ LOUISE W. FLANAGAN United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?