Brown v. Sears Holding Management Corporation et al

Filing 10

ORDER denying 9 Motion for Reconsideration regarding 6 Order - Signed by Chief Judge James C. Dever III on 8/1/2014. (Tripp, S.)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA EASTERN DIVISION No. 4:14-CV-33-D CALVINEARLBROWN, J>ladtltifJf, v. ) ) ) ) ) SEARS HOLDING MANAGEMENT CORJ>ORATION, et al., Defendants. ORDER ) ) ) ) ) On July 31, 2014, Calvin Earl Brown ("Brown'') filed a motion for reconsideration. See [D.E. 9]. Brown asks the court to reconsider its decision to deny Brown's motion to proceed in forma pauperis and motion for counsel. See id. Brown has not met the standard for relief under Rule 59(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil J>rocedure. See,~. Zinkand v. Brown, 478 F.3d 634,637 (4th Cir. 2007); Bogart v. Chapell, 396 F.3d 548, 555 (4th Cir. 2005); Hill v. Braxton, 277 F.3d 701, 708 (4th Cir. 2002); J>ac. Ins. Co. v. Am. Nat'l Fire Ins. Co., 148 F.3d 396,403 (4th Cir. 1998); Hughes v. Bedsole, 48 F.3d 1376, 1382 (4th Cir. 1995); Collison v. Int'l Chern. Workers Union, 34 F.3d 233, 236 (4th Cir. 1994); Hutchinson v. Staton, 994 F.2d 1076, 1081 (4th Cir. 1993). Thus, the motion for reconsideration [D.E. 9] is DENIED. SO ORDERED. This _1_ day of August 2014.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?