Brown v. Sears Holding Management Corporation et al
Filing
10
ORDER denying 9 Motion for Reconsideration regarding 6 Order - Signed by Chief Judge James C. Dever III on 8/1/2014. (Tripp, S.)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
EASTERN DIVISION
No. 4:14-CV-33-D
CALVINEARLBROWN,
J>ladtltifJf,
v.
)
)
)
)
)
SEARS HOLDING MANAGEMENT
CORJ>ORATION, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER
)
)
)
)
)
On July 31, 2014, Calvin Earl Brown ("Brown'') filed a motion for reconsideration. See
[D.E. 9]. Brown asks the court to reconsider its decision to deny Brown's motion to proceed in
forma pauperis and motion for counsel. See id.
Brown has not met the standard for relief under Rule 59(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil
J>rocedure.
See,~.
Zinkand v. Brown, 478 F.3d 634,637 (4th Cir. 2007); Bogart v. Chapell, 396
F.3d 548, 555 (4th Cir. 2005); Hill v. Braxton, 277 F.3d 701, 708 (4th Cir. 2002); J>ac. Ins. Co. v.
Am. Nat'l Fire Ins. Co., 148 F.3d 396,403 (4th Cir. 1998); Hughes v. Bedsole, 48 F.3d 1376, 1382
(4th Cir. 1995); Collison v. Int'l Chern. Workers Union, 34 F.3d 233, 236 (4th Cir. 1994);
Hutchinson v. Staton, 994 F.2d 1076, 1081 (4th Cir. 1993). Thus, the motion for reconsideration
[D.E. 9] is DENIED.
SO ORDERED. This _1_ day of August 2014.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?