Best v. Cequel

Filing 9

JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED in accordance with the court's order entered November 17, 2014, and for the reasons set forth more specifically therein, that plaintiff's complaint fails to allege sufficient facts to state any claim cognizable in law and is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). The plaintiff shall have and recover nothing from this action. Signed by Julie A. Richards, Clerk of Court on 11/17/2014. (Baker, C.)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA EASTERN DIVISION TIMOTHY DEAN BEST, Plaintiff, v. CEQUEL and parent Suddenlink Communications, LLC and their employees, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) JUDGMENT No. 4:14-CV-61-FL Decision by Court. This action came before the Honorable Louise W. Flanagan, United States District Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), wherein it was recommended that the court dismiss plaintiff’s complaints on frivolity review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED in accordance with the court’s order entered November 17, 2014, and for the reasons set forth more specifically therein, that plaintiff’s complaint fails to allege sufficient facts to state any claim cognizable in law and is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). The plaintiff shall have and recover nothing from this action. This Judgment Filed and Entered on November 17, 2014, and Copies To: Timothy Dean Best (via U.S. Mail) PO Box 186, Woodbourne, NY 12788 November 17, 2014 JULIE A. RICHARDS, CLERK /s/ Christa N. Baker (By) Christa N. Baker, Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?