Jones v. Sandersons Farms

Filing 18

ORDER DENYING 17 Motion to Resubmit Case to Pro Bono Panel. However, the Court will extend the time that the plaintiff has to respond to the Motion to Dismiss. The plaintiff has up and including 10/30/2014 to file a response. Signed by US District Judge Terrence W. Boyle on 10/7/2014. Copy mailed to pro se plaintiff, via US Mail, to 2263 Cannon Road, Hobgood, NC, 27843. (Fisher, M.)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA EASTERN DIVISION 4:14-CV-101-BO HUMPHREY JONES, Plaintiff, v. SANDERSONS FARMS, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER This matter is before the Court on plaintiff Humphrey Jones's prose motion to resubmit his case to the Pro Bono Panel [DE 17]. The Court finds that plaintiff has not demonstrated an adequate basis to resubmit his case to the District's Pro Bono Panel. Accordingly, his motion is DENIED. However, as plaintiff is proceeding pro se, and filed a motion to resubmit his case to the Pro Bono Panel during his extended time to respond to defendant's motion to dismiss, the Court will allow plaintiff additional time in which to respond to the motion to dismiss. Plaintiff shall have up to and including October 30, 2014 to file a response to the motion to dismiss. SO ORDERED. This the.![_ day of October, 2014. TE NCE W. BOYLE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JU

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?