Jones v. Sandersons Farms

Filing 18

ORDER DENYING 17 Motion to Resubmit Case to Pro Bono Panel. However, the Court will extend the time that the plaintiff has to respond to the Motion to Dismiss. The plaintiff has up and including 10/30/2014 to file a response. Signed by US District Judge Terrence W. Boyle on 10/7/2014. Copy mailed to pro se plaintiff, via US Mail, to 2263 Cannon Road, Hobgood, NC, 27843. (Fisher, M.)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
EASTERN DIVISION
4:14-CV-101-BO
HUMPHREY JONES,
Plaintiff,
v.

SANDERSONS FARMS,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on plaintiff Humphrey Jones's prose motion to resubmit his case
to the Pro Bono Panel [DE 17].
The Court finds that plaintiff has not demonstrated an adequate basis to resubmit his case to the
District's Pro Bono Panel. Accordingly, his motion is DENIED. However, as plaintiff is proceeding pro

se, and filed a motion to resubmit his case to the Pro Bono Panel during his extended time to respond to
defendant's motion to dismiss, the Court will allow plaintiff additional time in which to respond to the
motion to dismiss. Plaintiff shall have up to and including October 30, 2014 to file a response to the
motion to dismiss.

SO ORDERED.
This the.![_ day of October, 2014.

TE
NCE W. BOYLE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JU