Underwood et al v. SSC Clayton Operating Company LLC et al
Filing
24
ORDER granting 23 Motion to Seal 22 Proposed Sealed Document. The court also finds that Plaintiffs have shown good cause for their counsel's failure to comply with the court's April 24, 2015, Order [DE-15]. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to continue the management of this case. Signed by Senior Judge James C. Fox on 6/4/2015. (Grady, B.)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
WESTERN DIVISION
Civil Action No. 4:14-cv-00217-F
FRAN M. UNDERWOOD and DANNY C.
UNDERWOOD, co-Administrators ofthe
Estate ofFRANCES CARTER
UNDERWOOD, Deceased,
Plaintiffs,
~
SSC CLAYTON OPERATING COMPANY
LLC d/b/a BRIAN CENTER HEALTH and
RETIREMENT/CLAYTON, SSC
SUBMASTER HOLDINGS LLC, SSC
EQUITY HOLDINGS, LLC, NORTH
CAROLINA HOLDCO LLC,
SAVASENIORCARE ADMINISTRATIVE
SERVICES LLC, SAVASENIORCARE
LLC and SAV ASENIORCARE
CONSULTING LLC,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ORDER
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
This matter is before the court on the Plaintiffs' counsel response to the court's May 29,
2015 Order [DE-19] and motion to seal [DE-23] that response.
At the outset, the court notes that the motion to seal fails to comply with the Local Rules
of this court, the CM/ECF Policy Manual, nor Fourth Circuit precedent. Nevertheless, given that
the response details personal health information of a relative of Plaintiffs' counsel, the court
fmds that the privacy interest of counsel and her relative outweigh the public's interest in access
to the document. Accordingly, the court fmds good cause to seal the response, and the motion to
seal [DE-23] is ALLOWED. The court also finds that Plaintiffs have shown good cause for their
counsel's failure to comply with the court's April24, 2015, Order [DE-15].
The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to continue the management ofthis case.
SO ORDERED. This the__!:±_"day of June, 2015.
J
esC. Fox
Senior United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?