Tanner v. Colvin
Filing
24
ORDER granting 22 Consent Motion for Attorney Fees - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 5/6/2016. (Baker, C.)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
EASTERN DIVISION
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 4:15-cv-27
BETTY ANN TANNER,
PLAINTIFF,
VS.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
ACTING COMMISSIONER OF
SOCIAL SECURITY,
DEFENDANT.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ORDER
THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on the Plaintiff’s Consent Motion for Fees
Under the Equal Access to Justice Act 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A) filed on May 5, 2016. Having
reviewed the motion, supporting materials, memorandum in support, and the case file the Court
determines that Plaintiff should be awarded an attorney’s fee under the Equal Access to Justice
Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), in the amount of $5,375.00.
IT IS ORDERED that the Plaintiff’s Motion for Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice
Act 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A) filed is GRANTED, to the extent that the Court will award attorney
fees in the amount of $ 5,375.00, and that pursuant to Comm’r of Soc. Sec. v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. --,
130 S. Ct. 2521 (2010), the fee award will first be subject to offset of any debt Plaintiff may owe
to the United States. The Commissioner will determine whether Plaintiff owes a debt to the United
States. If so, the debt will be satisfied first, and if any funds remain, they will be made payable to
Plaintiff and mailed to Plaintiff’s counsel. If the United States Department of the Treasury reports
to the Commissioner that the Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, the government will exercise
its discretion and honor an assignment of EAJA fees, and pay the awarded fees directly to
Plaintiff’s counsel. No additional petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) shall be filed.
SO ORDERED this the 6th
day of
May
, 2016.
______________________________
LOUISE W. FLANAGAN
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?