Dimauro v. Colvin

Filing 22

CONSENT ORDER granting 21 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by District Judge Terrence W. Boyle on 5/29/2016. (Marsh, K)

Download PDF
IN TilE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA EASTERN DIVISION No. 4:15-cv-34-BO ) ) LYNDA DIMAURO, ) ) ) v. CONSENT ORDER ) ) CAROLYN COLVIN, ) Acting Commissioner of Social ) Security, ) Defendant. ) This action being submitted to the Court for entry of a Consent Order agreed to by the Plaintiff, parties and it appearing that Plaintiff, by and through her attorney, has executed this Consent Order and Defendant has executed this Consent Order, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney; and it appearing that the parties have agreed that the Commissioner of Social Security should pay the sum of$4,207.00 for attorney fees arising under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA). 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). It also appearing that the Treasury Judgment Fund should reimburse Plaintiffs counsel the $400.00 filing fee. It is therefore ORDERED that the Commissioner of Social Security pay to Plaintiff the sum of$4,207.00, and that the Treasury Judgment Fund pay to Plaintiff's Counsel $400.00, sent to Plaintiffs Counsel's office address in full satisfaction of any and all claims arising under EAJA, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and upon the payment of such sums this case is dismissed with prejudice. ThisJldayofflt' ,-:~ w. Untted States District Judge ,2016. IJ.,:a~ 0 , CONSENTED TO: Is/CHARLOTTE W. HALL Attorney for Plaintiff N.C. Bar# 41290 Charles T. Hall Law Finn, P.C. P.O. Box 10629 Raleigh, NC 27605 Telephone: (919) 791-1883 Fax: (919) 791-1886 charlotte@charleshallflrm.com Is/WANDA MASON Attorney for Defendant Special Assistant United States Attorney Social Security Administration Office of the General Counsel Altmeyer Building Room 617 6401 Security Boulevard Baltimore, MD 21235-6401 Telephone: (410) 966-5044 Fax: (410) 597-0137 Wanda.mason@ssa.gov Maryland Bar

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?