Dimauro v. Colvin
Filing
22
CONSENT ORDER granting 21 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by District Judge Terrence W. Boyle on 5/29/2016. (Marsh, K)
IN TilE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
EASTERN DIVISION
No. 4:15-cv-34-BO
)
)
LYNDA DIMAURO,
)
)
)
v.
CONSENT ORDER
)
)
CAROLYN COLVIN,
)
Acting Commissioner of Social
)
Security,
)
Defendant.
)
This action being submitted to the Court for entry of a Consent Order agreed to by the
Plaintiff,
parties and it appearing that Plaintiff, by and through her attorney, has executed this Consent
Order and Defendant has executed this Consent Order, by and through the undersigned Assistant
United States Attorney; and it appearing that the parties have agreed that the Commissioner of
Social Security should pay the sum of$4,207.00 for attorney fees arising under the Equal Access
to Justice Act (EAJA). 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). It also appearing that the Treasury Judgment Fund
should reimburse Plaintiffs counsel the $400.00 filing fee.
It is therefore ORDERED that the Commissioner of Social Security pay to Plaintiff the
sum of$4,207.00, and that the Treasury Judgment Fund pay to Plaintiff's Counsel $400.00, sent
to Plaintiffs Counsel's office address in full satisfaction of any and all claims arising under
EAJA, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and upon the payment of such sums this case is dismissed with
prejudice.
ThisJldayofflt'
,-:~
w.
Untted States District Judge
,2016.
IJ.,:a~
0 ,
CONSENTED TO:
Is/CHARLOTTE W. HALL
Attorney for Plaintiff
N.C. Bar# 41290
Charles T. Hall Law Finn, P.C.
P.O. Box 10629
Raleigh, NC 27605
Telephone: (919) 791-1883
Fax: (919) 791-1886
charlotte@charleshallflrm.com
Is/WANDA MASON
Attorney for Defendant
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Social Security Administration
Office of the General Counsel
Altmeyer Building Room 617
6401 Security Boulevard
Baltimore, MD 21235-6401
Telephone: (410) 966-5044
Fax: (410) 597-0137
Wanda.mason@ssa.gov
Maryland Bar
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?