Pratt v. Pitt County Department of Social Services et al

Filing 102

ORDER granting in part 101 Motion to Seal 100 PROPOSED SEALED Response. The Clerk is directed to file a redacted version of plaintiff's response in conformity with this order. Signed by Senior Judge W. Earl Britt on 9/7/2018. (Herrmann, L.)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
EASTERN DIVISION
NO: 4:16-CV-198-BR
CONSTANCE PRATT,
Plaintiff,
v.
RETHA ALLBRITTON, et al.,

Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

ORDER

This matter is before the court on plaintiff’s motion to seal her “response” to the 22
August 2018 Memorandum and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge Robert T. Numbers,
II. (DE # 101.) According to plaintiff, her response contains “personal info such as audio
manual filing and passwords.” (Id.) The only page of her response that contains such
information is page 10 of docket entry number 100-1. The court will allow that portion to be
filed under seal but will not seal the entire response. Accordingly, the motion to seal is
GRANTED IN PART, and the Clerk is DIRECTED to file a redacted version of plaintiff’s
response in conformity with this order.
This 7 September 2018.

__________________________________
W. Earl Britt
Senior U.S. District Judge