Dixon et al v. Prudential Prime Properties et al
ORDER denying 4 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Chief Judge James C. Dever III on 2/7/2017. Sent to Kelvin J. Dixon and Stephanie Dixon P.O. Box 794 Ayden, NC 28513 via United States Mail. (Briggeman, N.)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
KELVIN J. DIXON, and
PRUDENTIAL PRIME PROPERTIES, )
JODY TINGEN, PISTOL TINGEN,
JEFF MATHIS, and
On August 22, 2016, plaintiffs requested a preliminary injunction [D.E. 4]. A party seeking
a preliminary injunction must show: (1) a likelihood of success on the merits of the underlying .
claim; (2) ''that he is likely to suffer irreparable harm in the absence of preliminary relief'; (3) ''that ·
the balance of equities tips in his favor"; and (4) that an injunction would be in the public interest.
See Winter v. Nat'l Res. Def. Council. Inc., 515 U.S. 7, 20-2~ (2008); Cantley v. W.V. Reg'l Jail
and Corr. Facilizy Auth., 771 F.3d 201,207 (4th Cir. 2014). Plaintiffs have not made the required
showing. Thus, plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction [D.E. 4] is DENIED.
SO ORDERED. This :I_ day ofFebruary 2017.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?