United States of America v. Pender

Filing 19

DEFAULT JUDGMENT - against Defendant for failure of answer and in favor of Plaintiff, United States of America, against Defendant in the amount of $3,664.50, including interest as of September 22, 2017, and accruing thereafter at the daily rate of $0.07 from September 22, 2017 to the date of judgment,together with present and future costs and disbursements incurred by Plaintiff in this action; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that interest after date of entry of this judgment shall be at the applicable judgment rate of 1.41%. in favor of United States of America against Darryl L. Pender. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 10/19/2017. (Briggeman, N.)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ) ) ) ) ) JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE CASE NO. 4:16-CV-276-D ) ) DARRYL L. PENDER, Defendant. ) ) ) Decision by Court. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment is GRANTED; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall enter Judgement against Defendant for failure of answer and in favor of Plaintiff, United States of America, against Defendant in the amount of $3,664.50, including interest as of September 22, 2017, and accruing thereafter at the daily rate of $0.07 from September 22, 2017 to the date of judgment, together with present and future costs and disbursements incurred by Plaintiff in this action; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that interest after date of entry of this judgment shall be at the applicable judgment rate of 1.41%. This Judgment Filed and Entered on October 19, 2017, and Copies To: Roberto F. Ramirez DATE: October 19, 2017 (via CM/ECF electronic notification) PETER A. MOORE, JR., CLERK (By) /s/ Nicole Briggeman Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?