Holder v. Berryhill

Filing 28

ORDER granting 24 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by District Judge Terrence W. Boyle on 6/4/2018. (Briggeman, N.)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA EASTERN DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO.: 4:17-cv-35 SUSAN S. HOLDER, PLAINTIFF, vs. ) ) ) ) ) NANCY A. Bf;RRYHILL, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER FOR OPERATIONS, SOCIAL SECURITY, DEFENDANT. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) TIDS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on the Plaintiffs Consent Motion for Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(l)(A) filed on May 29, 2018. Having reviewed the motion, supporting materials, memorandum'in support, and the case file the Court determines that Plaintiff should be awarded an attorney's fee under the Equal Access to Justice Act ("EAJA"), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), in the amount of $5,900.00. IT IS ORDERED that the Plaintiffs Motion for Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice - Act28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(l)(A) filed is GRANTED, to the extent that the Court will award attorney fees in the amount of $5,900.00, and that pursuant to Comm'r of Soc. Sec. v. Ratliff, 560 U.S.--, 130 S. Ct. 2521 (2010), the fee award will first be subject to offset of any debt Plaintiff may owe to the United States. The Commissioner will determine whether Plaintiff owes a debt to the United States. If so, the debt will be satisfied first, and if any funds remain, they will be made payable to Plaintiff and mailed to Plaintiffs counsel. If the United States Department of the Treasury reports to the Commissioner that the Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, and the Commissioner determines there is a valid assignment ofEAJA fees, the Commissioner may pay the awarded fees directly to Plaintiffs counsel. No additional petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) shall be filed. This the _:j_ day of T:_UAM '2018. ~t>p United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?